Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ellen Brooks-Pollock |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ingrid Friesema |
5 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Muscatello |
14 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Craig Dalton |
16 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Ellen Brooks-Pollock |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Muscatello |
9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ellen Brooks-Pollock |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
8 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ellen Brooks-Pollock |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
16 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-68 |
You can find further information about peer review here.