Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Dessain |
25 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rodica Gilca |
28 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chen Wang |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chen Wang |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Scott Dessain |
13 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rodica Gilca |
27 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chen Wang |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
29 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chen Wang |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chen Wang |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
31 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Chen Wang |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
31 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
1 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-12-29 |
You can find further information about peer review here.