Skip to main content

Table 1 Key characteristics of the meta-analyzed reports (n = 24)

From: Meta-analysis to compare the accuracy of GeneXpert, MODS and the WHO 2007 algorithm for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis

Test

Author, (Year)

Ref

Country

Study HIV rate

Specimen type

Screen test

TP

FP

FN

TN

GeneXpert

Helb, 2010

[24]

Vietnam

1

Sputum frozen

Unclear

38

0

15

25

 

Malbruny, 2011

[25]

France

3.4

Various

FM

6

0

0

73

 

Bowles, 2011

[26]

Netherlands

NR

Sputum

ZN

21

0

4

23

 

Moure, 2011

[27]

Spain

NR

Sputum frozen

FM + ZN

61

0

17

20

 

Marlowe, 2011

[28]

USA

NR

Sputum sediment

Unclear

43

0

12

47

 

Theron, 2011

[29]

S. Africa

27

Sputum

FM

22

19

25

319

 

Rachow, 2011

[30]

Tanzania

59.9

Sputum frozen

ZN

11

1

7

102

 

Scott, 2011

[31]

S. Africa

70*

Sputum sediment

FM

11

3

7

104

 

Lawn, 2011

[32]

S. Africa

100

Sputum

FM

23

2

30

320

 

Ioannidis, 2011

[33]

Greece

NR

Sputum

Unclear

29

2

3

32

 

Miller, 2011

[34]

USA

NR

Sputum frozen

FM

3

2

2

58

 

Teo, 2011

[35]

Singapore

NR

Various

ZN

13

2

6

42

 

Nicol, 2011

[36]

S. Africa

24

Sputum-induced

FM

25

0

18

166

 

Rachow, 2012

[37]

Tanzania

51.2

Sputum

ZN

14

0

7

22

 

Safianowska, 2012

[38]

Poland

NR

Various

ZN

4

0

4

181

 

Total

     

324

31

157

1534

MODS

Arias, 2007

[39]

Brazil / Honduras

12*

Various

ZN

75

28

8

469

 

Mashta, 2011

[40]

India

NR

Sputum

ZN

17

45

27

146

 

Shah, 2011

[41]

S. Africa

87

Sputum

Unclear

36

13

14

407

 

Ha DT, 2010

[42]

Vietnam

100

Sputum

ZN

40

0

15

67

 

Chaiyasirinroje, 2012

[43]

Thailand

NR

Sputum

Unclear

13

1

4

37

 

Total

     

181

87

68

1126

WHO 2007 algorithm

Wilson, 2011

[44]

S. Africa

57*

Sputum-induced

FM

47

91

12

71

 

Swai, 2011

[45]

Tanzania

68.1

Sputum

ZN

66

107

61

179

 

Koole, 2012

[46]

Cambodia

26.5

Sputum

FM

20

70

14

270

 

Alamo, 2012. Rural site

[8]

Uganda

100

Sputum

ZN

18

2

1

1

 

Alamo, 2012. Urban site

[8]

Uganda

100

Sputum

ZN

9

13

1

10

 

Total

     

160

283

89

531

  1. Specimen type various included = bronchial aspirate, bronchial alveolar lavage.
  2. ZN = Ziehl-Nielsen microscopy stain method.
  3. FM = Fluorescent microscopy stain method.
  4. TP = True positive (Individuals have disease and have positive test).
  5. FP = False positive (Individuals do not have disease, but have positive test).
  6. FN = False negative (Individuals have disease, but have negative test).
  7. TN = True negative (Individuals do not have disease and have negative test).
  8. NR = Not reported.
  9. * = The rate reported was based on a denominator that included patients with undocumented HIV result.