Skip to main content

Table 3 Susceptibilities to key agents among the Proteus mirabilis isolates with and without ESBL or AmpC β-lactamases genes

From: Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Proteus mirabilis: a longitudinal nationwide study from the Taiwan surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (TSAR) program

Antimicrobial agenta

Susceptibility (%)

 

ESBL(+)/AmpC(+)

ESBL(+)/AmpC(-)

ESBL(-)/AmpC(+)

Non-ESBL phenotype & ESBL(-)/AmpC(-)

 

(n = 7)

(n = 88)

(n = 47)

(n = 1015)

Amikacin

57.1

28.4

40.4

97.8

Aztreonam

100

94.3

97.9

99.8

Cefepime (S/SDD)b

42.85/42.85

29.5/38.6

91.5/6.4

99.9/0.1

Cefotaxime

0

0

0

99.7

Ceftazidime

71.4

94.3

53.2

99.7

Ciprofloxacin

42.9

6.8

34.0

75.9

Ertapenem

100 (n = 4)

100 (n = 26)

100 (n = 26)

99.7 (n = 315)

Imipenem_2009

100

100

100

99.9

Imipenem

42.9

45.5

66.0

51.7

  1. aSusceptibility results are based on the current CLSI breakpoints [19]. For imipenem, results of the 2009 CLSI criteria are also shown for comparison [25]. All were susceptible to meropenem.
  2. bCefepime results are shown in susceptible and SDD (susceptible dose dependent) categories.