Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of pooled risk ratios and subgroup analyses of INH efficacy

From: Efficacy of isoniazid prophylactic therapy in prevention of tuberculosis in children: a meta–analysis

Groups

Number of studies

Number of participants

Fixed effects risk ratio(95% CI*)

Random effects risk ratio(95% CI)

Heterogeneity Chi 2( p)

All studies

8

10,320

0.65(0.47,0.89)#

0.53(0.38,0.80)

18.56(0.00968)

High quality

6

7,845

0.66(0.45,0.98)

0.55(0.35,0.87)

17.55(0.00357)

Low quality

2

2,474

0.53(0.30,0.94)

NA

0.47(0.49303)

HIV negative

6

9,509

0.55(0.40,0.75)

0.52(0.36,0.75)

8.57(0.1277)

HIV positive

2

810

0.86(0.41,1.81)

0.58(0.17,1.94)

5.14(0.02335)

TB endemic

5

2,189

0.78(0.55,1.11)

0.67(0.45,0.99)

8.93(0.06281)

TB non endemic

3

8,130

0.40(0.27,0.57)

NA

0.05(0.9736)

Primary TB prophylaxis

2

1,353

0.93(0.71,1.21)

NA

0.23(0.63119)

Secondary TB prophylaxis

3

5,224

0.44(0.31,0.61)

NA

1.05(0.59104)

Excluding studies INH was initiated at age ≤4 months

6

8,966

0.41(0.31,0.55)

NA

1.84(0.87086)

High quality excluding studies INH was initiated at age ≤4 months

4

6,492

0.38(0.27.0.53)

NA

0.43(0.93385)

INH initiated at age ≤4 months

2

1,353

0.93(0.71,1.21)

NA

0.23(0.29)

Age <5 years

3

1,616

0.86(0.57,1.30)

0.77(0.48,1.23)

5.14(0.07644)

Age 5–15 years

2

2,474

0.53(0.30,0.94)

NA

0.47(0.49303)

INH for ≥6 months

6

7,845

0.66(0.45,0.98)

0.55(0.35,0.87)

17.55(0.00357)

INH for <6 months

2

2,474

0.53(0.30,0.94)

NA

0.47(0.49303)

  1. *Adjusted for heterogeneity when appropriate.
  2. #1 minus the risk ratio gives the protective effect, e.g. for the first row, 0.65 corresponds to 35% protection.