Skip to main content

Table 4 Factors associated with anticipated preventive behaviors protecting oneself if 2 to 3 new human-to-human H5N1 cases were to be reported in Hong Kong

From: Anticipated and current preventive behaviors in response to an anticipated human-to-human H5N1 epidemic in the Hong Kong Chinese general population

 

Face mask use in public venues

Increased frequency of handwashing

Avoidance of eating poultry

 

Row%

ORu

ORm

Row%

ORu

ORm

Row%

ORu

ORm

Background characteristics

         

Age groups

         

   18 – 34

65.1

1.00

1.00

81.7

1.00

ns

55.9

1.00

ns

   35 – 60

78.9

2.00**

2.38***

89.6

1.93*

 

68.5

1.71**

 

Marital status

         

   Never married

64.9

1.00

ns

83.0

1.00

ns

55.3

1.00

1.00

   Ever married

79.0

2.04**

 

88.9

1.64 ~

 

68.9

1.79**

2.11***

Employment status

         

   Not employed full-time

65.8

1.00

1.00

86.4

ns

---

61.3

ns

---

   Employed full-time

78.9

1.95**

2.07**

86.8

  

65.5

  

Perceived modes of transmission of human-to-human H5N1:

         

Respiratory droplets

         

   No/not certain

62.5

1.00

ns

77.8

1.00

ns

61.1

ns

---

   Yes

75.6

1.86*

 

88.2

2.13*

 

64.3

  

Bodily contact

         

   No/not certain

70.0

1.00

ns

86.2

ns

---

61.2

ns

---

   Yes

77.8

1.50*

 

87.2

  

66.7

  

Objects contaminated with the virus

         

   No/not certain

72.1

ns

---

82.7

1.00

ns

62.4

ns

---

   Yes

74.8

  

89.2

1.73*

 

64.7

  

Eating well-cooked poultry

         

   No/not certain

73.8

ns

---

86.2

ns

---

60.3

1.00

1.00

   Yes

73.6

  

88.0

  

74.4

1.91**

1.92**

No. of items with "yes" responses in the above 4 items

         

   0 – 2

68.9

1.00

ns

83.8

1.00

ns

60.6

1.00

ns

   3 – 4

81.1

1.94**

 

91.0

1.97*

 

68.7

1.42 ~

 

Perceived impacts of human-to-human H5N1

         

Fatality rate

         

   Same as SARS/better than SARS/not certain

67.1

1.00

1.00

83.1

1.00

1.00

60.8

1.00

ns

   Worse than SARS

83.7

2.51***

1.86*

92.1

2.37**

1.94*

68.3

1.39 ~

 

Efficacy of treatment

         

   Same as SARS/better than SARS/not certain

71.5

1.00

ns

85.6

1.00

ns

62.8

ns

---

   Worse than SARS

89.2

3.31**

 

93.8

2.56 ~

 

70.8

  

Perceived chance to have a major human-to-human H5N1 outbreak in Hong Kong

         

   Low/very low chance/not certain

68.5

1.00

1.00

85.2

ns

---

59.9

1.00

1.00

   High/very high chance

84.3

2.47***

2.23**

89.8

  

71.7

1.69*

1.58*

Worry about oneself/family members contracting the virus a

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

63.9

1.00

1.00

81.5

1.00

1.00

57.5

1.00

ns

   Likely/very likely

82.2

2.61***

2.11**

91.1

2.32**

2.20**

69.3

1.67**

 

No effective drugs currently available

         

   Disagree/not certain

68.7

1.00

ns

83.5

1.00

ns

62.7

ns

---

   Agree

78.7

1.69*

 

89.8

1.73*

 

65.0

  

Perceived susceptibility to H5N1 infection

         

Oneself or one's family

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

69.3

1.00

ns

86.7

ns

---

62.5

ns

---

   Likely/very likely

85.9

2.71***

 

86.7

  

67.4

  

Older people

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

64.0

ns

---

88.0

ns

---

56.0

ns

---

   Likely/very likely

74.8

  

86.5

  

64.7

  

Adults

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

68.6

1.00

ns

84.3

ns

---

63.6

ns

---

   Likely/very likely

79.3

1.76**

 

89.3

  

64.0

  

Children

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

61.6

1.00

ns

82.2

ns

---

67.1

ns

---

   Likely/very likely

75.8

1.95*

 

87.4

  

63.3

  

Health care workers

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

63.8

1.00

ns

84.8

ns

---

64.8

ns

---

   Likely/very likely

76.4

1.83*

 

87.2

  

63.6

  

Food sellers

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

68.9

ns

---

81.1

ns

---

45.9

1.00

1.00

   Likely/very likely

74.6

  

87.6

  

66.9

2.38**

2.63***

Food dealers

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

68.6

1.00

ns

86.0

ns

---

60.5

ns

---

   Likely/very likely

76.4

1.48 ~

 

87.0

  

65.6

  

The general public

         

   Unlikely/very unlikely/not certain

68.9

1.00

ns

86.2

ns

---

61.7

ns

---

   Likely/very likely

83.4

2.28**

 

87.6

  

68.0

  

No. of items with "likely/very likely" responses in the above 8 items

         

   0 – 6

69.0

1.00

1.00

86.2

ns

---

62.3

ns

---

   7 – 8

88.1

3.33***

2.54**

88.1

  

68.3

  

Perceived efficacy of prevention measures

         

Quarantine of the infected people

         

   Low/very low/not certain

70.4

ns

---

88.9

ns

---

66.7

ns

---

   High/very high

73.9

  

86.6

  

63.7

  

Face mask use in public venues

         

   Low/very low/not certain

37.5

1.00

1.00

68.8

1.00

1.00

47.9

1.00

1.00

   High/very high

77.6

5.77***

2.78*

88.6

3.52***

2.21*

65.5

2.06*

1.87*

Frequent handwashing

         

   Low/very low/not certain

68.8

ns

---

50.0

1.00

1.00

71.9

ns

---

   High/very high

74.1

  

89.2

8.24***

7.76***

63.3

  

Home disinfection

         

   Low/very low/not certain

63.3

1.00

ns

75.5

1.00

ns

63.3

ns

---

   High/very high

74.9

1.73 ~

 

87.9

2.35*

 

63.9

  

Mass extermination of poultry

         

   Low/very low/not certain

66.9

1.00

ns

78.9

1.00

1.00

56.3

1.00

ns

   High/very high

76.5

1.61*

 

89.8

2.35**

2.12*

66.8

1.56*

 

No. of items with "high/very high chance" responses in the above 5 items

         

   0 – 3

46.8

1.00

1.00

69.4

1.00

ns

61.3

ns

---

   4 – 5

77.6

3.93***

2.75**

89.1

3.62***

 

64.2

  
  1. a Would worry that it is likely/very likely for oneself or one's family members to contract H5N1 (if 2–3 new cases were to be reported in Hong Kong. Gender and education level were not associated with any of the 3 dependent variables and were hence not tabulated.
  2. ORU = Univariate odds ratio.
  3. ORm = Odds ratios obtained from multivariate stepwise logistic regression using univariately significant (including marginally significant) variables as candidate variables.
  4. ~ 0.5 < p < 0.1; *p < 0.5; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
  5. ns = not significant.
  6. --- univariately non-significant and was not considered in the multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis.