Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of included cross-sectional control studies

From: The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Lyme borreliosis in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author_Year

Design

RoB_P

CrA_P

RoB_I

CrA_I

RoB_RS

CrA_RS

RoB_TaF

Albisetti 1997

Cross sectional

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Barrial 2011

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Bazovska 2001

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Bednarova 2006

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Bennet 2008

Cross sectional

Unclear

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Blaauw 1993

Cross sectional

Low

Low

High

High

Low

Low

Low

Blaauw 1999

Cross sectional

Low

High

Unclear

High/Low*

Low

Low

Unclear

Blanc 2007

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

High

Low

Unclear

Cermakova 2005

Cross sectional

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

High

Low

Low

Davidson 1999

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

High/Low*

High

High

Low

Ekerfelt 2004

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Jansson 2005

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

High

High

Low

Kolmel 1992

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

High

Low

Unclear

Ljostad 2005

Cross sectional

High

High

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Popperl 2000

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

High

High

Low

Roux 2007

Cross sectional

High

Unclear

Unclear

High/Low*

Low

High

Unclear

Skarpaas 2007

Cross sectional

Low

Low

High/Unclear*

Low

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Skogman 2008

Cross sectional

Unclear

Unclear

High

High

Low

Low

Low

  1. RoB_P: Risk of Bias in patient sampling; RoB_I: Risk of Bias in Index test; RoB_RS: Risk of Bias in Reference Standard; RoB_TaF: Risk of Bias in timing and flow. CrA_P: Concerns regarding applicability of patient sample; CrA_I: Concerns regarding applicability of Index Test; CrA_RS: Concerns regarding applicability of Reference Standard. * some studies evaluated more than one test and evaluated these in different ways (e.g. for one test the cut-off value was pre-specified, while for the other test it was based on the results)