Table 5 Stratification of subjects according to anti-Tat antibody isotypes
| Â | Antibody response (n) | Age: median (range) | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isotype | (n) | IgG | IgG | IgA | IgA | IgM | IgM | ||
Tat B | Tat C | Tat B | Tat C | Tat B | Tat C | n (%) | |||
IgG | (13) | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 (26–45) | 9 (69 %) |
IgA | (15) | 8 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 40 (25–55) | 6 (40 %) |
IgM | (21) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 19 | 34 (20–54) | 16 (80 %) |
IgM + IgG | (22) | 12 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 22 | 36 (20–61) | 13 (59 %) |
Neg | (25) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 (19–53) | 14 (56 %) |