First author, Year | n | Â | ART regimen | Grading of Dyslipidemia | % dyslipidemia | Pregnancy outcome | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ART during ANC % | NRTI % | NNRTI % | PI% | All | TC | TG | HDL-C | PTB n(%) | Stillbirth n(%) | LBW n(%) | PE n(%) | |||
Agostini 2008 [28] | 29 | 100% | 100%c | 34.4%c | 30.9%c | TCÂ >Â 200, TGÂ >Â 150Â mg/dl | - | 62.1 | 62.1 | - | - | - | - | 2 (6.9) |
10a | 100% | 100%c | - | - | Â | - | 40.0 | 30.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
10a | 100% | 100%c | 100%c | - | Â | - | 80.0 | 60.0 | - | - | - | - | - | |
9a | 100% | 100%c | - | 100%c | Â | - | 88.9 | 77.8 | - | - | - | - | - | |
Areechokchai 2009 [41] | 246 | 100% | Â | Â | Â | UNS | 1.2 | - | - | - | 25 (10.2) | 1 (0.4) | 49 (20) | 4 (1.6) |
40a | 16.3% cART | 100%a,b | >50%a | >20%a | Â | 7.5 | - | - | - | (19.4) | - | 0 | 3.2% | |
164a | 66.7% PMTCT | 99%a | 99%d | - | Â | 0 | - | - | - | (6.9) | - | 0 | - | |
42a | 17.1% ART in labor | 95.2%a | 95.2%d | - | Â | 0 | - | - | - | (19) | - | (19) | - | |
Bonafe 2013 [44] | 32 | 100% | 100%c | - | 100%a | Grade III | - | - | 6.3 | - | (19.3) | - | - | - |
31 | 100% | 100%c | - | 100%d | Â | - | - | 0 | - | (17.8) | - | - | - | |
Cade 2015 [35] | 16 | 100% | 75%a/25%c | - | 100%c | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Calza 2012 [42] | 21 | 100% | 100%a | - | 100%a | TCÂ >Â 200, TGÂ >Â 250Â mg/dl | - | 29 | 48 | - | - | - | - | - |
Duran 2006 [37] | 271* | 100% | - | - | - | Grade I/II | - | 12.2/0 | 6.7/0.7 | - | - | 6 (1.7) | - | - |
133a | 49.1% cART | 100%c | 30.8%a | 28.6%a | Â | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
33a | 12.2% PMTCT | 100%a | - | - | Â | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
El Beitune 2006 [29] | 25 | 100% | 100%a | - | 100%a | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
20 | 100% | 100%a | - | - | Â | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Floridia 2009 [26] | 375 | 75.4% | UNS | 22.9%a | 39.9%c | TCÂ >Â 240, TGÂ >Â 200Â mg/dl | - | 25.6 | 24.5 | 6.2 | - | - | - | - |
86a | 75.4% | UNS | 100%a | - | Â | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Floridia 2014 [27] | 322 | 100% | 97.8% | - | 100%a | - | - | - | - | - | 69 (21.4) | (<2) | 63 (20.8) | - |
106 | 100% | 98.1% | - | 100%e | Â | - | - | - | - | 20 (18.9) | (<2) | 24 (23.3) | - | |
Livingston 2007 [30] | 81 | 100% | 84/77%a | 2.0%a | 100%a | - | - | - | - | - | 8 (10) | - | 11 (14) | - |
77 | 96.10% | 88/91%a | 52.0%a | - | Â | - | - | - | - | 5 (7) | - | 9 (12) | - | |
Luzi, 2013 | 14 | 100% | 100%a | 7.1%c | 92.9%c | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Machado 2013 [31] | 49 | 69% | - | - | - | UNS | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Nasi 2011 [38] | 68 | 100% | 100%a,b | 55.9%a | 54.4%a | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Omo-Aghoja 2010 [32] | 154 | 100% | - | - | - | UNS | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Peixoto 2011 [33] | 164 | 100% | - | - | 100%a | Grade III-IV | - | 2.5 | 0.6 | - | 16 (9.8) | - | 33 (20.2) | - |
70 | 100% | - | - | 100%d | Â | - | 8.6 | 0 | - | 6 (8.7) | - | 11 (15.9) | - | |
Ramautarsing 2011 [36] | 20 | 45% | 100%c | - | 100%a | Grade III | - | 5 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
Santini-Oliveira 2014 [34] | 27 | 100% | - | - | 100%a | Grade I/II | - | 11.1/7.4 | 3.7/7.4 | - | 2 (3.8) | - | (14.3) | - |
26 | 100% | 97.9%a | - | 100%d | Grade I/II | - | 15.4/7.7 | 7.7/3.9 | - | 2 (3.8) | - | (11.5) | - |