Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of studies included in the review

From: Economic evaluations of HBV testing and treatment strategies and applicability to low and middle-income countries

Author, Year

Country

Population/

Setting

Comparator strategiesa

Data

Baseline parameters

Resultsa

HBsAg prevalence

Cascade of Care

Screening uptake

Linkage to care & Adherence to treatment

Eckman, 2011 [23]

USA

General population (primary care)

• Screen & treat

(4 regimens)

• No screening

CEA; Hypothetical cohort

2%

ns

100% adherence

$29,230/QALY

(2008)

Nayagam, 2016 [22]

The Gambia

General population (community)

• Screen & treat

• Status quo

CEA; Screening data

8.8%

68.9%

81.3% linkage,

80.9% adherence

$540/DALY

($645/LY,

$511/ QALY)

(2013)

Wong, 2011 [27]

Canada

Migrants (primary care)

• Screen & treat

• Screen, treat & vaccinate

• Status quo (no screening)

CEA; Hypothetical cohort

4.81%

100%

90% of all eligible will receive treatment

C$69,209/QALY

(2008)

Rossi, 2013 [25]

Canada

Newly arrived Migrants

• Universal vac

• Screen & vac

• Screen & treat

• Screen, treat & vac

• No intervention

CEA; Hypothetical cohort

6.5%

70%

60% linkage,

75% eligible will have treatment

C$40,880/QALY

(2011)

Hutton, 2007 [24]

USA

Asian & pacific islander adults

• Universal vac

• Screen & treat

• Screen, treat & ring vac

• Screen, treat & vac

• No intervention

CEA; Hypothetical cohort

10%

70%

100% will accept medical treatment

$36,000/QALY

(2006)

Jazwa, 2015 [30]

USA

Overseas testing of refugees

• Vaccination only

• Screen, vac & treat

CBA; Hypothetical cohort

6.8%

100%

60% linkage,

90% adherence

$90 M net benefit after 5 yearsb

(2012)

Veldhuijzen, 2010 [28]

Holland

Migrants

• Screen & treat

• Status quo

CEA; Hypothetical cohort

3.35%

35%

58% linkage,

75% adherence

€8966/QALY

Rein, 2011 [26]

USA

Asian Migrant population

(primary care & outreach)

• Comparison of 4 screening methods

CEA; Screening data

5.6–6.6%

n/a

n/a

$40- $280 per complete screen. $609–$4657 per positive case detected

(2008)

Ruggeri, 2011 [29]

Italy

High risk groups

• Screen & treat

• No screening

CEA; Hypothetical cohort

7%

100%

100% adherence

€18,225/QALY

  1. CEA Cost-effectiveness Analysis, CBA Cost Benefit Analysis, C$ Canadian dollar, ns not specified
  2. aThe most favourable comparator strategy is highlighted in bold and reported in the results column. The year in brackets represents the year of costs, if clearly reported in the study
  3. bValue of statistical life (basecase estimated at $5 M)