Skip to main content

Table 5 Univariate analyses of determinants in questionnaire 2

From: Prevention of tick bites: an evaluation of a smartphone app

Questionnaire 2

    

Univariate analysis

Variables

Total

(N = 238)

Non-app user group

(N = 130)

App user group

(N = 108)

Odds ratio

95% CI

P value

% (n/N)

% (n/N)

% (n/N)

Knowledge (scale range 1–8)a

 Low

22.7 (54/238)

26.9 (35/130)

17.6 (19/108)

Ref.

 High

77.3 (184/238)

73.1 (95/130)

82.4 (89/108)

1.73

0.92–3.24

.09

Perceived severity (scale range 1–7)b

 Negative

51.4 (119/226)

53.7 (65/121)

51.4 (54/105)

Ref.

 Positive

47.3 (107/226)

46.3 (56/121)

48.6 (51/105)

1.10

0.65–1.85

.731

Perceived susceptibility 1 (scale range 1–7)b

 Negative

44.5 (106/238)

45.4 (59/130)

43.5 (47/108)

Ref.

 Positive

55.5 (132/238)

54.6 (70/130)

56.5 (61/108)

1.08

0.65–1.80

.77

Perceived susceptibility 2 (scale range 1–7)b

 Negative

87.3 (145/166)

87.4 (76/87)

87.3 (69/79)

Ref.

 Positive

12.7 (21/166)

12.6 (11/87)

12.7 (10/79)

1.00

0.40–2.50

.998

Self-efficacy (scale range 1–7)b

 Negative

4.2 (10/238)

5.4 (7/130)

2.8 (3/108)

Ref.

 Positive

95.8 (228/238)

94.6 (123/130)

97.2 (105/108)

1.99

0.50–7.90

.32

Response efficacy (scale range 1–7)b

 Negative

8.8 (21/238)

9.2 (12/130)

8.3 (9/108)

Ref.

 Positive

91.2 (217/238)

90.8 (118/130)

91.7 (99/108)

1.12

0.45–2.76

.81

Intention (scale range 1–7)b

 Negative

5.5 (13/238)

6.9 (9/130)

3.7 (4/108)

Ref.

 Positive

94.5 (225/238)

93.1 (121/130)

96.3 (104/108)

1.93

0.60–6.46

.28

  1. ascore 1–4 = negative, score 5–8 = positive
  2. bscore 1–4 = negative, score 5–7 = positive