Table 2 Characteristics of the eligible studies with ELISA and the Kato-Katz method
Author, year | Period of study | Location | Endemic level | Type of endemic area | Type of ELISA | Fecal slides per stool | Study group | No. of seropositive with ELISA | No. total examined with ELISA | No. of fecal positive | No. total examined with Kato-Katz | Prevalence ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wu,1992 [51] | 1990–1991 | Gaojiao village in Duchang County, Jiangxi | high (prevalence rate: 64.4% before treatment; 54.5% after treatment) | MLa | McAb-Dot -ELISA | 2 | before treatment | 55 | 125 | 33 | 125 | 1.67 |
after treatment | 21 | 125 | 3 | 125 | 7.00 | |||||||
Huang,1994[45] | 1990–1991 | Lianshi,Xingou,Yangjiayuan,third and fifth group of Zhaonao villages in Qianjiang City, Hubei | low (Lianshi: <5%) middle (Xingou: 10%) high (Yangjiayuan and Zhaonao: 30%) | ML | Dot-ELISA | 3 | Lianshi | 3 | 68 | 8 | 68 | 0.38 |
Xingou | 15 | 79 | 23 | 79 | 0.65 | |||||||
Yangjiayuan | 18 | 85 | 24 | 85 | 0.75 | |||||||
Zhaonao III | 24 | 68 | 24 | 68 | 1.00 | |||||||
Zhaonao IV | 46 | 109 | 15 | 109 | 3.07 | |||||||
Song,2003 [46] | 2002 | Tanzhu village in Gaozi Town, Jiangsu | low | ML | SEA-ELISA | 3 | Â | 85 | 463 | 9 | 463 | 9.44 |
Bao,2006 [37] | 2005 | Xitan, Tangnan, Hongtang, Pudong four villages in Nanling County, Anhui | high (Xitan, Tangnan: TypeIvillage) middle (Hongtang, Pudong: Type IIvillage) | PWb | SEA-ELISA | 2 | GradeItype village | 70 | 324 | 54 | 693 | 2.77 |
GradeIItype village | 71 | 303 | 13 | 620 | 11.18 | |||||||
He,2007 | Â | Shujie village in Weishan County,Yunnan | high | HMc | SEA-ELISA | 3 | Â | 423 | 508 | 120 | 508 | 3.53 |
Chen,2007 | 2005 | Three villages in Eryuan County,Yunnan | low, middle and high endemic village respectively | HM | SEA-ELISA | 4 | low epidemic | 22 | 107 | 2 | 107 | 11.00 |
middle endemic | 67 | 128 | 7 | 128 | 9.57 | |||||||
high epidemic | 67 | 116 | 6 | 116 | 11.17 | |||||||
Xu,2007 | 2005 | Lianhu village in Poyang County,Chaipeng vliiage in Duchang County,Fuyu village in Yugan County, Jiangxi | high (Lianhu: 12.0%) middle (Chaipeng: 6.2%; Fuyu: 8.0%) | ML | F-ELISA | 3 | Lianhu | 446 | 873 | 83 | 961 | 5.92 |
Chaipeng | 130 | 243 | 25 | 401 | 8.58 | |||||||
Fuyu | 183 | 443 | 32 | 502 | 6.48 | |||||||
Zhou,2007 | Â | Village A in Jiangxi; Village B in Anhui | high (Village A: >10%) low (Village B: <5%) | Â | SEA-ELISA | 3 | Village A | 682 | 1024 | 130 | 1024 | 5.25 |
Village B | 503 | 787 | 36 | 787 | 13.97 | |||||||
He,2008 | 2004 | Linye village in Anqing City, Anhui | middle | ML | SEA-ELISA | 3 | Linye | 27 | 216 | 2 | 216 | 13.50 |
Lin,2010 | Â | Caohui village in Xinjian County,Jingtou vliiage in Duchang County,Xinhua village in Xingzi County, Jiangxi | Â | ML | SEA-ELISA | 3 | Caohui,M3 | 504 | 883 | 55 | 883 | 9.16 |
Jingtou,M3 | 358 | 927 | 73 | 927 | 4.90 | |||||||
Xinhua,M3 | 355 | 922 | 40 | 922 | 8.88 | |||||||
Yu,2011 | Â | Village A in Jiangxi | Â | Â | SEA-ELISA | 3 | Â | 80 | 333 | 13 | 333 | 6.15 |
She,2015 | 2012 | Dahekou village in Donggou Town, Jiangsu | low (reach transmission control status in 2009) | ML | SEA-ELISA | 3 | Â | 19 | 583 | 2 | 583 | 9.50 |