Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Quantitative evaluation of an innovation contest to enhance a sexual health campaign in China

Original Submission
10 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Habip Gedik
24 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ruxandra V Moroti-Constantinescu
2 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lloyd Goldsamt
25 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lloyd Goldsamt
19 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ye Zhang
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
25 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
4 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12879-019-3746-4

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page