Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariable and multivariable analysis of possible demographic and risk factors for toxoplasmosis in Thai Binh hospital

From: Sero-epidemiological status and risk factors of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women in Northern Vietnam

Variable

IgG seronegative

No. (%) or mean (sd)

IgG seropositive#

No. (%) or mean (sd)

Odds Ratio

(95% CI)

P-value

Univariable analysis

Level of education

   

0.157a,b

 College

92 (93%)

7 (7%)

–

 

 Preschool

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

4.11 (0.042–404)

 

 Primary school

9 (75%)

3 (25%)

4.54 (1.04–19.9)

 

 Secondary school

94 (97%)

3 (3%)

0.457 (0.124–1.69)

 

 High school

85 (93%)

6 (7%)

0.938 (0.313–2.81)

 

 University degree

87 (96%)

4 (4%)

0.634 (0.189–2.13)

 

 Post university degree

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

1.76 (0.053–58.5)

 

Street cleaning profession

   

0.114a,b

 No

370 (94.4%)

22 (5.6%)

–

 

 Yes

1 (50.0%)

1 (50.0%)

16.5 (0.997–272)

 

Consumption of pork

   

0.0095a,b

 No

1 (33.3%)

2 (66.7%)

–

 

 Yes

370 (94.6%)

21 (5.4%)

0.035 (0.003–0.375)

 

Consumption of chicken or duck

   

0.114a,b

 No

1 (50.0%)

1 (50.0%)

–

 

 Yes

370 (94.4%)

22 (5.6%)

0.061 (0.004–1.00)

 

Frequency meat consumption per week

10 (3)

9 (4)

0.906 (0.803–1.02)

0.108

River as usual source of water

   

0.058a,b

 No

371 (94%)

22 (6%)

–

 

 Yes

0 (0%)

1 (100%)

49.5 (0.525–4670)

 

Multivariable analysis

 Street cleaning profession

1 (50.0%)

1 (50.0%)

18.0 (1.09–299)

0.044b

 Consumption of pork

370 (94.6%)

21 (5.4%)

0.033 (0.003–0.359)

0.005b

  1. #Including seroconversion; aFisher’s exact test; bObtained using Firth’s bias reduction method [20]
  2. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, sd standard deviation