Table 3 Differences of NDO-LID antibodies according to low- low socioeconomic status and geographic area
Low-low socioeconomic status according to the geographic area | Sample size N (%) | Anti-NDO-LID protein A | Anti-NDO-LID IgM | Anti- NDO-LID IgG | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(+) N (%) | OR (95% CI) | P-value | (+) N (%) | OR (95% CI) | P-value | (+) N (%) | OR (95% CI) | P-value | ||
Low-low- UAChR | 17 (41) | 12 (71) | 3.6 (1.6–7.9) UAChR vs CR | 0.001 | 15 (88) | 8.9 (2.4–33.2) UAChR vs CR | < 0.0001 | 3 (18) | 2.5 (1.6–3.7) UAChR vs CR | 0.474 |
Low-low - CR | 18 (43) | 2 (11) | 1 (6) | 2 (11) | ||||||
Low-low- AR | 7 (17) | 1 (14) | 2 (1.04–3.9) UAChR vs AR | 2 (29) | 3.1 (1–11) UAChR vs AR | 0 | 1.5 (1.2–2) UAChR vs AR | |||