Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluation of the SpeeDx Carba (beta) multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of NDM, KPC, OXA-48-like, IMP-4-like and VIM carbapenemase genes

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 19, Article number: 571 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) have emerged as antibiotic-resistant bacteria of global concern. Here we assessed the performance of the Carba (beta) assay, a multiplex real-time PCR assay developed by SpeeDx for the detection of key carbapenemase-encoding genes: KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, IMP-4-like, and VIM.

Methods

DNA extracts of 180 isolates were tested with the Carba (beta) assay, using previously validated in-house TaqMan probe assays for the relevant carbapenemase genes as the reference standard. The Carba (beta) assay was then directly used to screen 460 DNA extracts of faecal specimens, with positive results subjected to the aforementioned in-house assays plus Sanger sequencing.

Results

The Carba (beta) assay correctly identified the presence of the respective carbapenemase genes in 154 of 156 isolates and provided negative results for all 24 non-CPO isolates. Two isolates provided positive results for OXA-48-like carbapenemase by the Carba (beta) assay only. The Carba (beta) assay had sensitivities of 100% for all targets, and specificities of 100% for KPC, NDM, IMP-4-like, and VIM targets, and 98.5% for OXA-48-like targets. When applied directly to faecal specimens, eight samples were positive by the Carba (beta) assay, two of which were confirmed by in-house TaqMan probe PCR or DNA sequencing.

Conclusions

The Carba (beta) assay is highly sensitive and specific for detecting key carbapenemase genes in isolates. Further testing is required to assess this assay’s suitability for direct screening of clinical specimens.

Peer Review reports

Background

Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) are antibiotic-resistant bacteria of global concern. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have assigned an “urgent” threat level to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae [1], and the World Health Organisation has identified carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli as “bacteria of international concern” [2]. Infections caused by CPOs are, at best, difficult-to-treat, and have sparked concerns over the potential of untreatable infections causing significant morbidity and mortality in health care settings worldwide [2,3,4,5]. Rapid detection of CPO infection and subsequent implementation of infection control procedures is pivotal to manage infection and to prevent further nosocomial transmission [6]. Carbapenemase genes of particular clinical importance globally include Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), oxacillin-hydrolyzing-48-like (OXA-48-like), imipenemase-4-like (IMP-4-like), and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) genes [3, 5, 7]. In this study, we assessed the performance of the new SpeeDx Carba (beta) multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of these carbapenemase genes using a panel of CPO isolates. As direct screening of patient samples (particularly rectal swab and faecal samples for intestinal carriage) is beginning to find its way into routine practice to inform infection control [8, 9], we then also applied the method to screen for carbapenemase genes directly in faecal specimens from local patients.

Methods

Isolates

The sensitivity and specificity of the Carba (beta) assay for carbapenemase detection was assessed by testing an isolate panel of CPOs (n = 156) [10,11,12,13,14] and non-CPOs (n = 24) of various bacterial species, and comparing the results to in-house TaqMan probe real-time PCR methods. By origin, CPO isolates were from Pakistan (n = 51), Saudi Arabia (n = 42), Australia (n = 19), Turkey (n = 17), USA (n = 17), Bahrain (n = 5) and Qatar (n = 5), and the 24 non-CPO isolates were from Australia. Isolate extracts were prepared using a simple boil-up method whereby single colonies were suspended in 1.0 mL of sterile water to provide a concentration consistent with a 0.5 McFarland standard, before being heated at 95 °C for 30 min.

Faecal specimens

Remnant DNA extracts from faecal samples (n = 460) submitted for routine gastrointestinal testing at Pathology Queensland were tested. In brief, the faecal samples were collected from November 2016 to January 2017 and were extracted at Pathology Queensland using the MagNA Pure 96 System (Roche, Australia) according to manufacturer’s instructions. All samples were tested with the Carba (beta) assay. Samples providing positive results in the Carba (beta) assay were subjected to in-house TaqMan probe PCR assays and Sanger sequencing.

SpeeDx Carba (beta) PCR

The Carba (beta) assay (SpeeDx Pty Ltd., Australia) was designed to detect KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, IMP-4-like, and VIM carbapenemase-encoding genes in a single multiplex reaction. The assay utilises PlexZyme (formerly known as MNAzyme) real-time detection technology [15,16,17] which has advantages in maintaining sensitivity and specificity in multiplex. Detection is predicted for all current known variants of VIM and KPC; NDM-1-7; OXA-48, 162, 163, 181, 204, 232, 244, 245, 247, 370; and IMP-1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 18, 19, 20, 24, 26, 27, 30, 33, 37, 38, 42, 48, 49, 52. The Carba (beta) PCR reaction was prepared as per the manufacturer’s instructions, with 15.0 μL of master mix and 5.0 μL of isolate suspension or faecal extract. Reactions were amplified on the ABI7500 real-time PCR instrument (ThermoFisher Scientific, Australia) using the manufacturer’s cycling conditions: an initial 95 °C 2 min hold, followed by 10 touch-down cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 61 °C (− 0.5 °C per cycle) for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 52 °C for 40 s. KPC was reported by FAM, NDM by JOE, OXA-48-like by Texas Red, IMP-4-like and VIM by Cy5 (and therefore IMP-4-like and VIM results could not be distinguished), and the internal control by TAMRA. The internal control DNA was diluted to provide an expected cycle threshold (Ct) value of approximately 22 cycles as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

In-house PCR

In-house PCR methods utilised previously described primers and probes (see Table 1) for KPC [18], NDM [18], OXA-48-like [19], IMP-4-like [20], VIM [20] and pan-bacterial 16S rRNA [18] (the latter serving as an internal DNA extraction and amplification control). NDM, KPC and 16S rRNA reactions were performed together in a triplex, IMP-4-like and VIM as a duplex, and OXA-48-like as a singleplex reaction. The reverse primer of the OXA-48-like reaction was modified from the original [19] (G to C at position 15) based on sequence data from GenBank. The QuantiFast Probe PCR Kit (QIAGEN, Australia) was used as the basis for the reaction mixes. Each mix comprised 0.5 μM of forward and reverse primers, 0.25 μM of probe and 2.0 μL of isolate preparation or faecal extract in a total reaction volume of 20.0 μL. Reactions were amplified on the Rotor-Gene (QIAGEN, Australia) real-time PCR instrument using an initial 95 °C hold for 3 min followed by 45 cycles at 95 °C for 3 s and 60 °C for 30 s.

Table 1 Oligonucleotides for in-house assays in this study
Full size table

PCR controls and environmental practices

All PCR test runs included relevant positive control reaction/s to assess PCR amplification and at least two non-template (sterile H2O) negative control reactions to check for contamination. Sample extraction, mix preparation, DNA preparation/handling, and PCR amplification were all conducted in separate areas using dedicated equipment.

Detection limit comparisons

To assess the detection limits of the Carba (beta) assay in comparison to the in-house assays, five CPO isolates were selected as representatives of each carbapenemase gene. DNA extracts of each of these samples were serially diluted ten-fold and run in three to five replicates (see Table 5) through the Carba (beta) assay and the relevant in-house assay. Concentrations were based on the initial isolate extracted at 0.5 McFarland standards (i.e. approximately 1.5 × 105 Colony Forming Units (CFUs) per μL of DNA extract). The detection limit for each target and assay was the lowest dilution where all replicates provided consistent positive Ct values.

DNA sanger sequencing

Select samples were subjected to DNA sequencing using the primers described in Table 2. Amplification was carried out in 20.0 μL reaction volumes with 0.5 μM of each primer and 2.0 μL of isolate preparation or faecal extract using the QuantiTect SYBR PCR Kit (QIAGEN, Australia) as the basis for the reaction mix. Reactions were cycled on the Rotor-Gene instrument using an initial 95 °C hold at 15 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 60 s, and finally a melt step from 45 to 95 °C at + 0.2 °C/second. PCR products were submitted to the Australian Genomic Research Facility (AGRF; The University of Queensland) for Sanger sequencing and aligned to representative sequences from GenBank.

Table 2 Amplification and sequencing primers for Sanger sequencing
Full size table

Results

Isolate extracts

The results for isolate extracts are summarised in Table 3. Results from the Carba (beta) assay for 178 of 180 isolates (98.9%) were in concordance with the reference in-house PCR methods. Of these 178 concordant isolates, 154 isolates were correctly-characterised CPOs (16 KPC, 50 NDM, 40 OXA-48-like, 21 VIM, 19 IMP-4-like, six isolates with NDM and OXA-48-like, one isolate with KPC and NDM, and one isolate with OXA-48-like and VIM) and 24 isolates were negative by both the Carba (beta) assay and in-house PCR. A further two isolates provided discrepant results; these two isolates (one Pseudocitrobacter faecalis and one Pseudomonas aeruginosa) provided concordant results for NDM and IMP-4-like/VIM targets respectively, but were positive for OXA-48-like by the Carba (beta) assay only. Using the in-house assay results as the reference standard, the Carba (beta) assay’s sensitivities and specificities were both 100% for KPC, NDM, IMP-4-like and VIM genes, while for OXA-48-like genes sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 98.5%.

Table 3 Cycle threshold (Ct) results for isolate extract sample bank (n = 180). Results are grouped by carbapenemase type as determined by the Carba (beta) assay, then by species. Results highlighted in grey were negative upon repeated extraction and testing (discussed further in-text)
Full size table

An assessment of the Ct values for samples providing concordant positive results (n = 154) showed that 152 provided Carba (beta) assay Ct values of less than 20 cycles (7.0–18.9; mean 13.8 cycles). Two isolates (both K. pneumoniae and both positive for two genes) provided Carba (beta) assay Ct values of 12.6 cycles (KPC) and 34.7 cycles (NDM) for one isolate and 10.3 cycles (OXA-48-like) and 24.4 cycles (IMP-4-like/VIM) for the second isolate, with in-house PCR assay Ct values of 22.9 cycles (KPC) and 39.5 cycles (NDM), and 19.3 cycles (OXA-48-like) and 36.4 (VIM) respectively. The two isolates providing discrepant results (P. faecalis and one P. aeruginosa, again both positive for two genes) both provided Ct values < 20 cycles in the Carba (beta) assay for the concordant results (NDM and IMP-4-like/VIM targets respectively), but Ct values of 27.8 or 30.9 cycles for OXA-48-like. These Ct values were the highest observed for OXA-48-like in the Carba (beta) assay.

All four isolates providing Carba (beta) assay Ct values greater than 20 cycles were re-extracted and retested. For each of these isolates, the target originally providing Ct values greater than 20 cycles was negative upon repeat, whereas the results associated with Ct values < 20 cycles were reproducible.

It should be noted that the Carba (beta) assay cycling conditions utilise an initial 10-cycle touchdown step, during which fluorescent signal is not acquired, hence samples tested by Carba (beta) assay typically provided Ct values that were approximately 10 cycles earlier than in-house PCR methods utilising conventional cycling.

Faecal specimens

Of the 460 faecal DNA extracts tested, 452 were negative for carbapenemase targets by the Carba (beta) assay (see Table 4). Seven samples provided positive results for OXA-48-like (Ct values 25.1 to 28.9 cycles), and one sample for IMP-4-like/VIM (25.4 cycles). When tested by the in-house assays, the seven OXA-48-like samples provided negative results, whereas the IMP-4-like/VIM positive sample produced a positive result in the IMP-4-like PCR (Ct value of 31.4 cycles). DNA sequencing was attempted for all eight samples; one of the OXA-48-like positive samples returned a sequence confirmed as OXA-181, and the IMP-4-like/VIM positive sample returned an IMP-4 sequence. Amplification for DNA sequencing was not successful for the other samples.

Table 4 Results for faecal swab clinical extracts (n = 460). Regarding ‘n/a’ results, only clinical extracts positive by the Carba (beta) assay were subjected to in-house assays and DNA sequencing
Full size table

Assay detection limits

The Carba (beta) assay detection limit was the same for NDM, KPC and VIM targets, and was more sensitive for OXA-48-like and IMP-4-like targets, in comparison to the corresponding in-house assays (see Table 5). The detection limits for the Carba (beta) assay were approximately 1.5 CFU/μL for all five targets. Detection limits for the in-house assays were approximately 15 CFU/μL for IMP-4-like and OXA-48-like assays and 1.5 CFU/μL for KPC, NDM and VIM assays.

Table 5 Detection limits for Carba (beta) assay and in-house assays. Performance was assessed individually (i.e. with five isolates possessing only one of the assayed genes) using isolate extracts characterised in this study. All Ct values for replicates at each dilution level are shown. Results beyond the limit of detection for each assay and gene are shaded in grey
Full size table

Discussion

The results indicate the Carba (beta) assay is suitable for detection of carbapenemase genes in cultured isolates. Correct results were provided for 154 of 156 CPO isolates and 24 of 24 non-CPO isolates, giving the Carba (beta) assay 100% sensitivity and ≥ 98.5% specificity for cultured isolate extracts. From a practical standpoint, the single reaction format of the Carba (beta) assay offers significant advantages in terms of isolate testing throughput over our current in-house methods, which currently require three reactions per isolate.

The reduced OXA-48-like specificity observed for the Carba (beta) assay was due to two isolates (P. faecalis and P. aeruginosa) that gave OXA-48-like Ct values of 27.8 and 30.9 cycles. These were negative by the OXA-48-like in-house assay and DNA sequencing, and subsequently provided negative results in the Carba (beta) assay when re-extracted and retested. Negative results following re-extraction and retesting were also observed for a further two isolates that initially provided Ct values of 34.7 cycles and 24.4 cycles for NDM and VIM respectively in the Carba (beta) assay. Such high Ct values are indicative of low DNA loads, and likely suggests these isolates were contaminated with other genomic DNA during the original sample preparation. Employing a Ct value cut-off in the Carba (beta) assay may help to address these issues, but additional experimentation would be needed to establish appropriate cut-offs for the isolates and different types of clinical samples.

The initial results from the direct faecal sample testing suggest the Carba (beta) assay may be suitable for screening purposes, but more work is needed here. The majority of samples (98.3%; 452/460) returned negative results. This low detection rate is consistent with previous studies indicating these genes are at low prevalence in our local Australian population [21]. However, of the eight positive samples by the Carba (beta) assay (seven for OXA-48-like and one for IMP-4-like/VIM), only two of these positives were confirmed by in-house PCR and/or DNA sequencing (one IMP-4 and one OXA-181). It is possible that OXA-48-like genes may be present in the six non-confirmed samples, and were only detected by the Carba (beta) assay due to its more sensitive detection limit; as seen in Tables 4 and 5, the OXA-48-like Ct values provided by the faecal samples were similar to the Ct value for the limit of OXA-48-like detection. Alternatively, these may be due to contamination as discussed earlier. We were unable to investigate this further as, unlike the isolates, the original faecal samples were not available for re-extraction and retesting. Nevertheless, further validation of direct sample testing is warranted, including from patients at higher risk of harbouring CPOs. In this context, a limitation of this investigation was that we only tested a bank of faecal samples from patients with suspected gastrointestinal infection from a low-CPO prevalence setting. An additional limitation of this study was that we did not assess the detection limit of the assays for each of the individual gene variants.

Conclusion

In summary, the Carba (beta) assay developed by SpeeDx was sensitive and specific for detecting carbapenemase genes in isolates. Applying a Ct value cut-off when testing isolate extracts may be useful to enhance performance. Further studies are required to determine the suitability of this assay for direct testing of clinical samples.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Materials for this study are retained at the University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Australia.

Abbreviations

AGRF:

Australian Genomic Research Facility

CFU:

Colony Forming Unit

CPO:

carbapenemase-producing organism

Ct:

Cycle threshold

IC:

internal control|

IMP:

imipenemase

KPC:

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase

NDM:

New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase

OXA:

oxacillin-hydrolyzing

rRNA:

ribosomal ribonucleic acid

VIM:

Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States. 2013; https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/index.html

  2. World Health Organisation: Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. 2014; http://www.who.int/drugresistance/documents/surveillancereport/en/

  3. Tangden T, Giske CG. Global dissemination of extensively drug-resistant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: clinical perspectives on detection, treatment and infection control. J Intern Med. 2015;277:501–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Falagas ME, Tansarli GS, Karageorgopoulos DE, Vardakas KZ. Deaths attributable to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1170–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Duin D, Doi Y. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence. 2017;8:460–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nordmann P, Gniadkowski M, Giske CG, Poirel L, Woodford N, Miriagou V, European network on Carbapenemases. Identification and screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:432–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Healthcare-associated Infections (HAI): Tracking CRE [https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/cre/trackingcre.html] Accessed 28 Nov 2017.

  8. Tato M, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Traczewski M, Dodgson A, McEwan A, Humphries R, Hindler J, Veltman J, Wang H, Cantón R. Multisite evaluation of Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay for detection of Carbapenemase-producing organisms in rectal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1814–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry C, Davies K, Woodford N, Wilcox M, Chilton C. Survey of screening methods, rates and policies for the detection of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae in English hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2018;101(2):158–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zowawi HM, Sartor AL, Balkhy HH, Walsh TR, Al Johani SM, AlJindan RY, Alfaresi M, Ibrahim E, Al-Jardani A, Al-Abri S, et al. Molecular characterization of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the countries of the Gulf cooperation council: dominance of OXA-48 and NDM producers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3085–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zarakolu P, Day KM, Sidjabat HE, Kamolvit W, Lanyon CV, Cummings SP, Paterson DL, Akova M, Perry JD. Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium, chromID OXA-48, for recovery of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from patients at a university hospital in Turkey. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34:519–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sidjabat HE, Townell N, Nimmo GR, George NM, Robson J, Vohra R, Davis L, Heney C, Paterson DL. Dominance of IMP-4-producing enterobacter cloacae among carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Australia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:4059–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wailan AM, Sartor AL, Zowawi HM, Perry JD, Paterson DL, Sidjabat HE. Genetic contexts of blaNDM-1 in patients carrying multiple NDM-producing strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:7405–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Doi Y, Potoski BA, Adams-Haduch JM, Sidjabat HE, Pasculle AW, Paterson DL. Simple disk-based method for detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-type β-lactamase by use of a Boronic acid compound. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:4083–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mokany E, Bone SM, Young PE, Doan TB, Todd AV. MNAzymes, a versatile new class of nucleic acid enzymes that can function as biosensors and molecular switches. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1051–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mokany E, Tan YL, Bone SM, Fuery CJ, Todd AV. MNAzyme qPCR with superior multiplexing capacity. Clin Chem. 2013;59:419–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mokany E, Todd AV. MNAzyme qPCR: a superior tool for multiplex qPCR. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1039:31–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Multiplex real-time PCR detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) and New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM-1) genes. Healthcare-associated Infections - Laboratory Resources 2011.

  19. Naas T, Cotellon G, Ergani A, Nordmann P. Real-time PCR for detection of blaOXA-48 genes from stools. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:101–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carter I. Metallo β lactamases gene blaimp, blaspm and blavim detection by multiplex real-time TaqMan assay on the Smartcycler. In: Schuller M, Sloots TP, James GS, Halliday CL, Carter IWJ, editors. PCR for clinical microbiology: an Australian and international perspective. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. p. 423–7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care: CARAlert annual report 2016–2017 2017; https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CARAlert-Report-March-2016-to-March-2017.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Sameera Al Johani from King Abdualaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Emad Ibrahim from Hamad Medical Corporation in Qatar and Jameela Alsalman from Salmaniya Medical Complex in Bahrain for providing some of the isolates in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by SpeeDx Pty Ltd. SpeeDx Pty Ltd. provided the Carba (beta) kits and funding for the consumables used in this study. Co-authors from SpeeDx Pty Ltd. (MW, RW and LYT) participated in study conception and design, data analysis, and manuscript writing as per the ‘Authors’ contributions’ section.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Amanda Bordin and Ella Trembizki contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Amanda Bordin, Ella Trembizki, Cameron Buckley, Melanie Syrmis, Kyra Cottrell, Hosam M. Zowawi, Hanna E. Sidjabat, Patrick N. A. Harris, David L. Paterson & David M. Whiley

  2. SpeeDx Pty. Ltd., Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Madeline Windsor, Rachel Wee & Lit Yeen Tan

  3. Pathology Queensland Central Laboratory, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Melanie Syrmis, Haakon Bergh, Patrick N. A. Harris, Graeme R. Nimmo & David M. Whiley

  4. College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hosam M. Zowawi

  5. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infection Prevention and Control, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hosam M. Zowawi

  6. Gulf Cooperation Council Center for Infection Control, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hosam M. Zowawi

  7. King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hosam M. Zowawi

  8. Griffith University School of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Graeme R. Nimmo

Authors
  1. Amanda Bordin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ella Trembizki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Madeline Windsor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rachel Wee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lit Yeen Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cameron Buckley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Melanie Syrmis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Haakon Bergh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kyra Cottrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hosam M. Zowawi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hanna E. Sidjabat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Patrick N. A. Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Graeme R. Nimmo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. David L. Paterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. David M. Whiley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DMW, RW, HB, HMZ, HES, GRN, DLP and PNAH were involved in study conception and design. Sample extraction and testing was performed by AB, ET, CB, MS and KC. Data analysis for the Carba (beta) assay was performed independently by 1) ET and AB from the University of Queensland and 2) MW, RW and LYT from SpeeDx Pty Ltd. Analysis of in-house assay and sequencing data was performed by ET and AB. DMW, AB, ET and LYT were major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Whiley.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) of Children’s Health Queensland and The University of Queensland (HREC/13/QRCH/39). Informed consent was waived as per section 2.3.6 of the NHMRC national statement.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

This study was funded by SpeeDx Pty Ltd. MW, RW and LYT are employees of, and own stock or options in, SpeeDx Pty Ltd. DMW is a member of the editorial board of BMC Infectious Diseases.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bordin, A., Trembizki, E., Windsor, M. et al. Evaluation of the SpeeDx Carba (beta) multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of NDM, KPC, OXA-48-like, IMP-4-like and VIM carbapenemase genes. BMC Infect Dis 19, 571 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-019-4176-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-019-4176-z

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us