Skip to main content

Table 1 Compared TB-SPRINT 59-Plex Beamedex® results for rifampin and isoniazid resistance detection with BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 system among the three sites evatuated, and Genotype®MTBDRplusbetween with BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960 system

From: Multicenter evaluation of TB-SPRINT 59-Plex Beamedex®: accuracy and cost analysis

    

BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960

S

R

SE

SP

PPV

NPV

A

K*

TB-SPRINT

FIOCRUZ

RIF n=58

S

21

2

92.8

70

74.2

91.3

81

0.623

R

9

26

INH n=69

S

32

4

88.5

94.1

93.9

88.9

91.3

0.826

R

2

31

UFRJ

RIF n=57

S

47

3

70

100

100

94

94.7

0.794

R

0

7

INH n=83

S

51

3

90

96.2

93.1

94.1

93.9

0.869

R

2

27

UFMG

RIF n=78

S

45

2

93.1

91.8

87.9

95.7

92.3

0.838

R

4

27

INH n=89

S

51

5

86.1

96.2

93.9

91

92.1

0.835

R

5

28

MTBDRplus

RIF n=105

S

69

1

97.2

100

100

98.5

99

0.979

R

0

35

INH n=105

S

69

6

83.3

100

100

92

94.2

0.868

R

0

30

  1. RIF rifampin, INH isoniazid, S sensitive, R resistant, SE sensitivity, SP specificity, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value, A accuracy, K kappa value; *all kappa value showed p value < 0.001. Interpretation of Kappa value: < 0.20 = poor; 0,21–0,40 = weak; 0,41–0,60 = moderated; 0,61–0,80 = good; > 0,80 = very good