Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics associated with preferred PrEP formulation versus the rest formulations among Chinese MSM, 2017 (N = 965)

From: Prepared for PrEP: preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among Chinese men who have sex with men in an online national survey

 

Injectable PrEP

OR (95%CIf)

aORa (95%CIf)

Disclosed to medical provider

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.26 (0.99, 1.67)

1.26 (0.96, 1.64)

Ever heard about PrEP

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.54 (1.10, 2.14)*

1.55 (1.11, 2.17)*

Partner seeking onlineb

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

0.86 (0.63, 1.16)

0.86 (0.63, 1.17)

Multiple sexual partnersc

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.04 (0.80, 1.37)

1.02 (0.78, 1.35)

Condomless sexc

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

0.81 (0.62, 1.05)

0.81 (0.62, 1.06)

Role during anal sexc

 Both

Ref

Ref

 Insertive

0.84 (0.59, 1.19)

0.82 (0.58, 1.17)

 Receptive

0.60 (0.43, 0.84)*

0.61 (0.43, 0.85)*

Multiple HIV testsb, d

 No

Ref

Ref

 Yes

1.38 (1.05, 1.80)*

1.36 (1.04, 1.78)*

Community engagement in sexual healthe

 No

Ref

Ref

 Minimal

1.43 (0.82, 2.49)

1.46 (0.83, 2.55)

 Moderate

1.21 (0.78, 1.87)

1.20 (0.78, 1.87)

 Substantial

1.48 (0.94, 2.32)

1.46 (0.93, 2.29)

  1. Other PrEP formulations include oral PrEP and rectal microbicides. Bold refers to associations that have a 95% CI that does not include 1
  2. Logistic regressions adjusted variables include age, education, and annual income
  3. aAdjusted variables included age, education, and annual income
  4. bin the last 12 months
  5. cin the last 3 months
  6. dtwo or more HIV tests
  7. eN = 950
  8. fConfidence interval
  9. *p < 0.05