Skip to main content

Identify clinical factors related to Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia with hypoxia in children

Abstract

Background

To analyze the clinical characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia with hypoxia in children, and identify the associated risk factors of hypoxia in MPP.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was performed on 345 children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) admitted to our hospital wards from January 2017 to June 2019. They were divided into three groups, namely MPP with hypoxia, refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP), and general Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (GMPP). The clinical features, laboratory findings, imaging, and management were collected and compared in the three groups.

Results

The MPP with hypoxia patients (n = 69) had longer disease duration, a higher extra-pulmonary complications rate, and more severe radiological abnormalities (P < 0.05). They also needed more complicated treatments (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the levels of white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), interleukin (IL)-6, ferritin, D-dimer, fibrinogen (FG), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and the percentage of neutrophils in the MPP with hypoxia group were significantly higher than those in the RMPP group and the GMPP group (P < 0.05). In ROC curve analysis, the percentage of neutrophils, WBC, CRP, LDH, IL-6, ferritin, D-dimer, and ALT were contributed to identify the MPP with hypoxia patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that ferritin> 174.15 ng/mL, IL-6 > 25.475 pg/ml, and pleural effusion were significantly associated with the incidence of hypoxia in MPP (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

MPP with hypoxia patients presented more serious clinical manifestations. Ferritin> 174.15 ng/mL, IL-6 > 25.475 pg/ml and pleural effusion were related risk factors for hypoxia in MPP.

Peer Review reports

Background

Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) is one of the commonest causes of pediatric community-acquired pneumonia, causing 10–40%of cases [1, 2]. MPP, often described as a self-limiting disease, is typically mild and cured without medication [3], but sometimes it can develop into a severe and/or fulminant disease, which is always with severe complications such as respiratory failure, hypoxia, and even acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [4, 5]. As we all know, hypoxia often relates to rapid disease progression and death. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to recognize the MPP with hypoxia earlier, grasp the appropriate opportunity for reasonable therapy, and reduce complications.

In our study, we retrospectively analyzed the cases of MPP hospitalized in our hospital between January 2017 and June 2019. Then to explore the related factors predicting MPP with hypoxia, we compared the differences of clinical features, laboratory findings, imaging, and treatments in the MPP with hypoxia, refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (RMPP), and general Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (GMPP).

Methods

Patient selection

Clinical information

Sixty-nine patients in MPP with hypoxia were admitted to the Respiratory Department of Tianjin Children’s Hospital from January 2017 to June 2019. We also randomly selected 86 patients in the RMPP group and 190 patients in the GMPP group from the same period. All cases met the diagnostic criteria.

Diagnostic criteria

All patients had clinical evidence of pneumonia on admission such as a fever, cough, and pneumonic infiltrations in the chest radiograph. MP infection was based on the positive results for MP polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests of nasopharyngeal secretions (88.70%) or positive results of a serological test (11.3%). Anti-MP IgM titrations were performed twice at the time of admission and before discharge, and we selected patients whose test result was a seroconversion (negative to positive), four-fold or greater increase in IgM titers, or both high titers of>1:640 (MP-IgM antibody titer ≥1:160) [6]. Hypoxia was defined as any recorded oxygen saturation of < 92% by pulse oximetry, measured on room air [7]. RMPP mainly referred to the MPP characterized by persistent fever and progressive exacerbations of clinical symptoms, signs, and related imaging manifestations after standard treatment with macrolide drugs for ≥1 week [8].

The inclusion criteria

(1) met the diagnostic criteria; (2) the age was less than 15 years old.

The exclusion criteria

(1) someone had other respiratory pathogen infections and tuberculosis by following tests: blood cultures, nasopharyngeal aspirate cultures, nasopharyngeal aspirate for virus reverse transcriptase real-time multiplex PCR, serology for Chlamydia pneumoniae (CT) and Legionella pneumophila (LG), and protein purified derivative (PPD). (2) someone had basic diseases such as asthma, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, rheumatism and immune deficiency. (3) someone had a previous history of hypoxia. (4) someone had used glucocorticoid before admission.

Data collection

Hospitalization demographic, clinical information, laboratory findings, imaging, and management of all children included in the study were collected retrospectively. Nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens were routinely collected within 24 h of admission.

Respiratory specimens were tested for bacterial culture, virus using RT-mPCR, and MP using PCR. Peripheral blood samples were obtained on admission for the determination of complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin (IL)-6, lactic acid, ferritin (Fer), D-dimer, fibrinogen (Fg), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and specific antibody to MP. Blood culture was also performed on admission. Chest radiography was performed before admission or during hospitalization. If a patient had one of the following conditions, he or she would undergo a CT scan: 1. the clinical manifestations inconsistent with the chest radiograph;2. suspected airway and lung malformations; 3.serious complications associated with pneumonia; 4.routine treatment ineffective, and exclude other diseases such as interstitial lung disease, pulmonary tuberculosis, so on [9, 10]. The percent of CT scans in MPP with hypoxia, RMPP and GMPP was 100,84.88, and 17.69% respectively.

Observation indexes

Clinical features (sex, age, duration of fever, peak fever, dyspnea, complications, etc.), laboratory findings, imaging, hospitalization time, and treatments.

Ethics

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Tianjin Children’s Hospital. And the data from patients were analyzed anonymously.

Data analysis

SPSS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis. The normal distribution data was represented by mean ± SD (\( \overline{x}\pm s \)). One-way ANOVA was used for comparison between groups. The LSDt-test was used for comparison within the group. The skewed distribution data were expressed as median (P25, P75), which comparisons were made by the Mann-Whitney U-test. And Chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were operated to evaluate candidate markers related to MPP with hypoxia, and logistic regression analysis was performed to select variables associated with MPP with hypoxia. The difference was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Basic information of patients

One hundred ninety-four male and 151 female patients with a median age of 8 (4–6) years were included in this study. There were 69 cases in the MPP with hypoxia group (34 men; 35 women),86 cases in the RMPP group (48 men; 38women), and 190 cases in the GMPP group (112 men; 78 women). The median age was 6 (4–8) years in the MPP with hypoxia,6 (4–8) years in the RMPP, and 6 (4–7) years in GMPP. There was no statistical difference in age and gender among the three groups.

Clinical characteristics of patients (Table 1)

All patients presented a cough, and 350(98.87%) patients had fever. And the MPP with hypoxia group had a higher fever (39.1–41 °C) than the other two groups (P < 0.05). Moreover, differences were observed in the incidence of rash, liver function damage, chest pain, toxic encephalopathy, thromboembolism, dyspnea, mucous plugging between the MPP with hypoxia and the other two groups (P < 0.05).

Table 1 Clinical characteristic of MPP with hypoxia, RMPP and GMPP patients

Laboratory and imagine the features of patients

Laboratory findings and imaging manifestations in the MPP with hypoxia, RMPP, and GMPP groups were summarized in Tables 2 and 3. In MPP with hypoxia patients, the average of white blood cell count (WBC), percentage of peripheral neutrophils(N%), CRP, IL-6, ALT and ferritin (fer) was 10.19 × 109/L,68.81%,51.21 mg/L,69.96 pg/ml, 47.17 U/L and 421.61 ng/L respectively, which were significantly higher than those in other groups (P all <0.05). And the level of fibrinogen was lowest in the MPP with hypoxia (3.70 g/L: 4.27 g/L: 4.52 g/L, p < 0.05). As for LDH and D-dimer, there were statistical differences only between the MPP with hypoxia and the GMPP (p < 0.01), besides PCT was observed the difference only between MPP with hypoxia and RMPP groups (p < 0.05), In contrast, lactic acid and AST showed no difference among the three groups (p>0.05).

Table 2 Laboratory findings of MPP with hypoxia, RMPP, and GMPP patients
Table 3 Imaging of MPP with hypoxia, RMPP, and GMPP patients

In addition to laboratory findings, the radiological abnormalities were more severe in the MPP with hypoxia. The proportion of pulmonary consolidation among MPP with hypoxia, RMPP, and GMPP was 79.71, 80.23and 64.74% respectively (p < 0.01). Pulmonary complications were more likely to occur in the MPP with hypoxia. And there were significant differences among the three groups, including atelectasis (31.88%: 23.25%: 12.11%, P < 0.01) and pleural effusion (65.22%%: 32.56%%: 9.47%%, P < 0.01). However, the incidence of pleural thickening among the three groups was no statistical difference (p > 0.05).

Clinical course and treatment of patients

Regarding the clinical course, the median duration of fever was 12 (9–14) days in the MPP with hypoxia group, 10 (8–12) days in the RMPP group, and 9 (8–10) days in the GMPP group (P < 0. 01). And The median length of hospital stay was 12 (9–15) days in the MPP with hypoxia group, 9 (8–10) days in the RMPP group, and 6 (5–7) days in the GMPP group (P < 0. 01). A total of 205 patients (57.90%) were treated with glucocorticoid after admission, and the proportion in the MPP with hypoxia group was significantly higher than that in the other two groups (100% versus 84.06,71.05% P < 0 01). Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed in 201 cases (56.77%). The number of patients using the fiberoptic bronchoscope in the MPP with the hypoxia group was significantly higher (84.06% vs 70.93% vs 43.16% P < 0.01). Moreover, the MPP with the hypoxia group received a higher proportion of oxygen therapy and gamma globulin compared to the other two groups (P < 0.01). All patients were treated with azithromycin. In our study, all the children recovered and discharged from the hospital without death.

Predictive values of the independent correlation factors in patients with MPP with hypoxia

The ROC analysis was used to explore predictive values of laboratory date for MPP with hypoxia, and the critical value with maximum sensitivity and specificity was also determined in Fig. 1. ROC analysis showed that IL-6, ferritin, and D-dimer were of great significance in the diagnosis of MPP with hypoxia, the area of which under the curve was above 0.7. When the cut-off value for the IL-6, ferritin, and D-dimer was set at 25.47 pg/ml, 171.15 ng/mL, and 0.45 μg/L, the sensitivity and specificity in recognized MPP with hypoxia were 73.5 and 68.9%, 82.4 and 69.3%, 64.7, and 75.1%, respectively in Table 4.

Fig. 1
figure 1

ROC Curve for predictive values of the independent correlation factors in patients with MPP with hypoxia

Table 4 Predictive values of the independent correlation factors for MPP with hypoxia

Multiple logistic regression analysis for the related factors predicting the MPP with hypoxia

To further evaluate the predictors associated with MPP with hypoxia, multiple logistic regression was performed. IL-6 > 25.47 pg/ml, ferritin > 174.15 ng/mL, and pleural effusion played a significant role in predicting the MPP with hypoxia, with the odds ratio (OR) values of 3.005,3.430, and 3.183, respectively in Table 5.

Table 5 Stepwise logistic regression analysis for the related factors predicting the MPP with hypoxia

Discussion

Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia continues to be a vital cause of childhood community-acquired pneumonia and is usually a benign self-limited disease. However, sometimes it develops into severe or fulminant cases, endanger the lives [11]. And death is always associated with diffuse pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), brain herniation, vascular thrombosis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation [12,13,14,15,16]. Hypoxia is an important indicator of disease severity. So it is crucial to early diagnosis and early intervention for MPP with hypoxia. However, there were still few studies on MPP with hypoxia, especially in children. So we conducted a retrospective study to identify the associated risk factors of hypoxia in MPP, including 69 cases of the MPP with hypoxia group, and randomly selected 86 cases of the RMPP group and 190 cases of the GMPP group as a control. All cases met the diagnostic criteria.

First of all, there was no difference in age and sex between the three groups. And the median age of all groups was 6 years old, which was consistent with the age of the high incidence of MPP [1].

Secondly, the signs and symptoms in the MPP with hypoxia group were more serious, and the incidence of extrapulmonary complications was higher. In the study, the median time to hypoxia was 10(9–12) days, which was similar to the study on fulminant MPP of Izumikawa et al. [7] Some literature has shown that liver function damage was the most common extrapulmonary complication of MPP with hypoxia [17, 18]. In our research, 13 cases (18.84%) of MPP with hypoxia complicated with liver function damage. Moreover, MP infection might contribute to hypercoagulability and cause thromboembolism itself, which was serious extrapulmonary complication [19]. In this study, a total of 7 patients developed thromboembolism, which was located in the lower limb artery (2 cases), lung (4 cases), and heart (1 case). These serious complications also led to longer hospitalization and more complex treatments in the MPP patients with hypoxia. Our study showed the number of people using glucocorticoids in the MPP with hypoxia was more than that in the other two groups, besides only the MPP with hypoxia used gamma immunoglobulin.

At present, there were few studies on MPP with hypoxia. The current theory of excessive immune response causing MPP progression was generally accepted [20,21,22,23]. In the laboratory indicators, the level of WBC, neutrophil ratio, CRP, LDH, IL-6, and ferritin were related to MPP with hypoxia, which was similar to the previous case reports [24,25,26]. Taken together, the evidence suggested a serious immune-inflammatory reaction in the MPP with hypoxia.

The radiological manifestations of MPP were various, mostly bronchial wall thickening, centrilobular nodules, ground-glass attenuation, and consolidation [27]. And our study showed that the imaging findings of MPP with hypoxia were not specific, mainly pulmonary inflammatory consolidation (79.71%). However, MPP with hypoxia was more likely to be accompanied by atelectasis, pleural effusion, and aggravated in a short period. Miyashita et al. indicated that bilateral infiltrates and pleural effusion commonly present in the MPP with hypoxia [18]. It further suggested the severity of the disease, which may be related to the direct invasion of MP and excessive host immune response.

As for the treatment of macrolides, there was no significant difference between the three groups, which may be connected with the high rate of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae (MRMP) in China, ranging from 69 to 100% in recent years [28]. Chen Z et al. found that there was no significant difference in the resistance rate of MP between the GMPP group and the RMPP group [29]. But there were reports of severe cases in MRMP among children treated with macrolides [30,31,32], which may be related to a higher host immune response caused by higher and more persistent stimulation of M. pneumoniae. So, we think a high macrolide-resistant rate may be a factor leading to hypoxia in MPP.

MP infection may cause varying degrees of respiratory mucus thrombus obstruction, even form bronchial molding, resulting in airway stenosis and occlusion [33]. Our study showed the MPP with hypoxia group had a higher incidence of mucous plugging. Hence we suspect that may be a cause of hypoxia in MPP. But it still needs further research. Pediatric flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy can clear respiratory secretions under direct view, relieve airway obstruction, and reduce the occurrence of complications [9]. In our study, the indications for bronchoscopy were atelectasis or segmental inflammatory consolidation on imaging, with lesion area of one or more lung segments, rinsing local lesions, and taking alveolar lavage fluid for pathogen detection [9]. A total of 201 children (58.26%) received fiberoptic bronchoscopy intervention therapy, among which the MPP with hypoxia group received more of this treatment(p < 0.01).

However, the use of pediatric flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy is still controversial. Although we think that the early application of fiberoptic bronchoscopy will shorten the course of the disease and accelerate the recovery of the disease. After all, it is an invasive therapy and blindly expanding the indication may cause harm to the patients. Therefore, in this setting, we should more carefully evaluate before operation and weigh the pros and cons. Besides, the surgeon must have skilled operation skills. It is necessary for the surgeon to observe the situation of the patients closely during and after the operation, and to deal with possible complications in time.

To explore the related risk factors predicting MPP with hypoxia, we used the ROC curve and multivariate logistic regression analysis. ROC analysis revealed that the area under the curve of ferritin, IL-6, and D-dimer were above 0.7, which were helpful to recognize the patients in MPP with hypoxia. And the optimal cutoff value for three factors was 174.15 ng/mL, 25.47 pg/ml, and 0.45 μg/L, respectively. Besides, multiple logistic regression analysis was made to improve the predicted accuracy. We found that ferritin > 174.15 ng/mL, IL-6 > 25.47 pg/ml and pleural effusion were good predictors of MPP with hypoxia. Ferritin represents not only iron reserves but also an inflammatory marker [34]. When inflammation occurs, inflammatory factors act on the body to increase the production of ferritin in serum. At the same time, inflammatory factors cause degeneration and necrosis of local tissue cells, dissolution, and rupture of the cell membrane, resulting in leakage of serum ferritin from damaged cells. As a result, ferritin is significantly increased in the inflammatory response. However, there is still no report about the correlation of ferritin in MPP with hypoxia. Some studies [35] on RMPP reported when the ferritin level was 230 ng/mL or higher, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing refractory MP pneumonia were 67 and 67%, respectively. In our study, the optimal cutoff point for ferritin was 174.15 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 69.3%, and the odds ratio of logistic regression analysis was 3.430. The reason for its difference may be the unrecognized mixed infection in our case. IL-6 plays an important role in the early stage of the immune response. In our research, the area under the curve for IL-6 was 0.737, and the optimal cutoff point was 25.47 pg/ml, with a sensitivity of 73.5% and specificity of 68.9%, the odds ratio of logistic regression analysis was 3.005. Chen et al. showed that the cutoff value of IL-6 for RMPP was 14.75 pg/ml [21]. At present, it is considered that the increase of IL-6 is connected to the severity and course of the disease [36], which further suggests that there may be an excessive immune response in MPP with hypoxia. The advantage of the study is that we first explore the predictors of hypoxia in MPP. Starting from the actual clinical cases, the differences of MPP with hypoxia, RMPP, and GMPP in large samples are compared and analyzed, and the interference of mixed factors is eliminated. It provides a strong basis for the early identification of MPP with hypoxia and has a certain degree of innovation and practicality.

There are several limitations to this study. Firstly, it was a retrospective study, and there may have been some selection bias. Secondly, there may be the presence of mixed infection in some cases which cannot be detected. Therefore, In the future work, we should further carry out long-term multicenter, large sample prospective studies, and further explore the problems found in clinical work, to provide a reliable theoretical basis for early identification, early diagnosis and early intervention of MPP with hypoxia.

Conclusion

Our study shows that excessive immunological inflammation may play an important role in MPP with hypoxia. FER > 174.15 ng/mL, IL-6 > 25.47 pg/ml and pleural effusion were high risk factors for MPP with hypoxia. MPP with hypoxia patients may need to require glucocorticoid therapy and bronchoscopy.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MPP:

Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia

RMPP:

Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia;

GMPP:

General Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia

MRMP:

Macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

CRP:

C-reactive protein

LDH:

Lactic dehydrogenase

PCT:

Procalcitonin

IL:

Interleukin lactic acid

Fer:

Ferritin

Fg:

Fibrinogen

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

References

  1. Liu WK, Liu Q, Chen DH, et al. Epidemiology of acute respiratory infections in children in Guangzhou: a three-year study. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jain S, Williams DJ, Arnold SR, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):835–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hawkins S, Rausch CM, McCanta AC. Constrictive pericarditis secondary to infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011;23(1):126–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Izumikawa K. Clinical features of severe or fatal Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:800.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bajantri B, Venkatram S, Diaz-Fuentes G. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: a potentially severe infection. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(7):535–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SC, Youn YS, Rhim JW, Kang JH, Lee KY. Early serologic diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: an observational study on changes in titers of specific-IgM antibodies and cold agglutinins. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(19):e3605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Izumikawa K, Izumikawa K, Takazono T, et al. Clinical features, risk factors and treatment of fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a review of the Japanese literature. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20(3):181–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ding Y, Chu C, Li Y, et al. High expression of HMGB1 in children with refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):439.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Subspecialty Group of Respiratory Diseases, The Society of Pediatrics, Association CM, Editorial Board, Chinese Journal of Pediatrics. Guidelines for management of community acquired pneumonia in children (the revised edition of 2013) (I). Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013;51(10):745–52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andronikou S, Goussard P, Sorantin E. Computed tomography in children with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(11):1431–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Takiguchi Y, Shikama N, Aotsuka N, Koseki H, Terano T, Hirai A. Fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Intern Med. 2001;40(4):345–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maisel JC, Babbitt LH, John TJ. Fatal Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection with isolation of organisms from lung. JAMA. 1967;202(4):287–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koletsky RJ, Weinstein AJ. Fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Report of a fatal case, and a review of the literature. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980;122(3):491–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Novelli VM, Matthew DJ, Dinwiddie RD. Acute fulminant toxic encephalopathy associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985;4(4):413–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Boer J, Aerdts SJ, Groeneveld PH. Severe diffuse interstitial pneumonia due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in a patient with respiratory insufficiency. Neth J Med. 2003;61(3):91–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Almeida JF, Stape A, Troster EJ. Acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by mycoplasma pneumoniae in a child: the role of methylprednisolone and clarythromycin. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2011;9(3):386–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta R, Gupta A, Goyal V, Guleria R, Kumar A. Mycoplasma pneumonia associated with rhabdomyolysis and the Guillain-Barre syndrome. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2005;47(4):305–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miyashita N, Obase Y, Ouchi K, et al. Clinical features of severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adults admitted to an intensive care unit. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56(Pt 12):1625–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Joo CU, Kim JS, Han YM. Mycoplasma pneumoniae induced popliteal artery thrombosis treated with urokinase. Postgrad Med J. 2001;77(913):723–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan C, Xue G, Zhao H, et al. Molecular and clinical characteristics of severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019;54(7):1012–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Li S, Yang D, Wu X, Chen Z. The clinical characteristics and predictors of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0156465.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao J, Li Y, Zhang W. The clinical significance of IL-6 s and IL-27 s in Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from children with mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sekine H, Taguchi H, Watanabe H, et al. Immunological analysis and pathological examination of gnotobiotic mice monoassociated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58(Pt 6):697–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Takata T, Hirakawa M, Sakurai M, Kanazawa I. Fulminant form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: successful treatment with hypothermia. J Neurol Sci. 1999;165(1):94–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshida T, Asato Y, Kukita I, et al. A 7-year-old boy with mycoplasmal infection requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eur J Pediatr. 2003;162(1):44–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mizukane R, Kadota Ji J, Yamaguchi T, et al. An elderly patient with hemophagocytic syndrome due to severe mycoplasma pneumonia with marked hypercytokinemia. Respiration. 2002;69(1):87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyashita N, Sugiu T, Kawai Y, et al. Radiographic features of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: differential diagnosis and performance timing. BMC Med Imaging. 2009;9:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yin YD, Wang R, Zhuo C, et al. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae prevalence and clinical aspects in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia in China: a prospective multicenter surveillance study. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(10):3774–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Sheng Y, Zhang L, Shen Z, Chen Z. More complications occur in macrolide-resistant than in macrolide-sensitive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):1034–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheong KN, Chiu SS, Chan BW, To KK, Chan EL, Ho PL. Severe macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia associated with macrolide failure. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016;49(1):127–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsieh YC, Tsao KC, Huang CG, et al. Life-threatening pneumonia caused by macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31(2):208–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lung DC, Chan YH, Kwong L, Que TL. Severe community-acquired pneumonia caused by macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in a 6-year-old boy. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17(5):407–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang L, Lu S, Feng Z, et al. The early examination of combined serum and imaging data under flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy as a novel predictor for refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia diagnosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(50):e9364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kell DB, Pretorius E. Serum ferritin is an important inflammatory disease marker, as it is mainly a leakage product from damaged cells. Metallomics. 2014;6(4):748–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Choi YJ, Jeon JH, Oh JW. Critical combination of initial markers for predicting refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a case control study. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Tian F, Han B, Duan M. Serum tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin −6 and galctin-3 concentrations in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014;16(10):1001–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We owe our thanks to Wei Guo, Jiao Tian, and Zhenli Zhu for their work on revising and data extracting in this manuscript.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771589)

the Key Project of Tianjin Health Care Professionals (16KG166)

the Program of Tianjin Science and Technology Plan (18ZXDBSY00170)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and Design: YYL, TQZ, CQC, and YSX; Extraction of Data: YYL, WG, ZLZ, and JT; Drafting the Article: YYL; Revising It for Intellectual Content: YYL, CQC, and YSX; Final Approval of the Completed Article: YYL, TQZ, CQC, and YSX. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunquan Cai or Yongsheng Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were following the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Children’s Hospital. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. The data used in this study were anonymized before its use.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ling, Y., Zhang, T., Guo, W. et al. Identify clinical factors related to Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia with hypoxia in children. BMC Infect Dis 20, 534 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-020-05270-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-020-05270-6

Keywords