Skip to main content

Bioaerosol sampling of patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis: a study protocol

  • The Correction to this article has been published in BMC Infectious Diseases 2020 20:624

Abstract

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is transmitted in bioaerosols containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Despite being central to ongoing TB transmission, no routine diagnostic assay exists to measure Mtb in bioaerosols. Furthermore, published studies of Mtb in bioaerosol samples have been limited to individuals with sputum-positive pulmonary TB. Notably, TB diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms and sputum laboratory findings. This is despite the fact that approximately half of all patients commencing TB treatment are sputum-negative, resulting in a high proportion of presumptive treatments. Here, we propose to use a sensitive air sampling protocol to investigate the prevalence of Mtb-containing bioaerosols in both sputum-positive and sputum-negative TB suspects, at the same time evaluating the potential to identify unrecognized transmitters of TB.

Methods

Our parallel-group design will identify viable Mtb in bioaerosols produced by individuals attending a TB clinic in South Africa. Sampling will be performed on eligible individuals presenting with symptoms indicative of TB and repeated at 14 days if initially positive. Participants will be prospectively classified into three distinct groups based on National TB Control Program (NTBCP) criteria: Group A, TB notification with sputum-based laboratory confirmation; Group B, TB notification with empiric diagnosis; and Group C, individuals not notified. Group C individuals with detectable Mtb bioaerosol will be monitored until resolution of clinical and laboratory status. Collection of bioaerosol specimens will be via two consecutive sampling modalities: (1) direct sampling following a specific respiratory manoeuvre; and (2) indirect sampling during passive respiratory activity. Bioaerosol specimens will be analyzed for viable Mtb using DMN-trehalose staining and live-cell fluorescence microscopy. Mtb genomes and mycobacterial and host lipids will be detected using droplet digital PCR and mass spectrometry analyses, respectively. The primary objective is to determine the prevalence of Mtb bioaerosols in all TB clinic attendees and in each of the groups. Secondary objectives are to investigate differences in prevalence of Mtb bioaerosol by HIV status and current isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) use; we will also determine the impact of anti-TB chemotherapy on Mtb-containing bioaerosol production.

Discussion

Respiratory bioaerosol has a potential role in non-invasive TB diagnosis, infectivity measurement and treatment monitoring.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04241809. Date of Registration: 27/1/2020.

Peer Review reports

Background

Tuberculosis (TB), which is caused by the obligate human pathogen, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), is the foremost infectious cause of death in adults globally [1]. Persistence of the TB epidemic is driven by successive cycles of infection, pulmonary disease, Mtb bioaerosol expulsion and inhalation by susceptible individuals. Interventions to interrupt this cycle are critical to curb the TB epidemic, however knowledge of the physical process of Mtb transmission is limited. This is primarily due to the paucity of investigations detecting, quantifying and characterizing Mtb bioaerosols. As others have highlighted [2], it remains unclear when source cases become infectious, how long after effective treatment they remain infectious, what are the respiratory mechanisms of aerosolization, and how long Mtb bioaerosols remain viable in the environment. Furthermore, while sputum Mtb positivity and presence of lung cavitation predict infectiousness, prediction is partial (and based on retrospective, epidemiological analyses) thus limiting accurate risk stratification for contact screening. To address these knowledge gaps, tools to facilitate direct detection of viable aerosolized Mtb bacilli in exhaled breath are urgently required.

To improve the utility of Mtb bioaerosol sampling, it is essential to maximize detection yield. Three key elements to consider are: (1) patient bioaerosol production; (2) an efficient bioaerosol collection apparatus; and (3) the Mtb detection modality. Previous bioaerosol studies have used a spectrum of sampling approaches. These include subjects coughing into an apparatus for 10 min with culture-based detection [3], sitting passively in a chamber for 1 h with a combination of culture and PCR detection [4], and wearing a modified face mask for 10 min to 5 h with PCR detection [5, 6]. Though instructive, these studies have been limited to individuals with sputum-positive pulmonary TB, with detection yields ranging from 28 to 77%. This range of outcomes can be attributed to the spectrum of inter-individual infectiousness; however, the unknown variance in intrinsic sensitivity of each of the systems is likely to be more significant. Put simply, the absence of Mtb bioaerosol in a sampled individual may only indicate Mtb numbers below the detection threshold of the sampling system, rather than non-production. Consequently, optimizing all elements of the sampling process is essential to identify Mtb bioaerosol in paucibacillary individuals. Critical factors include the site in the respiratory tract of bioaerosol generation [7], bioaerosol volume obtained, and the limit of detection of the technique used to identify the organism. Bioaerosol specimen volumes are likely to be in the order of nanolitres so, even with Mtb bacilli concentrations greater than in sputum [4], standard assays may be inadequate.

This study will assess an optimized bioaerosol sampling system based on the previously described Respiratory Aerosol Sampling Chamber (RASC) [8]. Patient-derived bioaerosol generated by specific respiratory manoeuvres will be directly captured to maximize aerosol volume. In addition, passive respiratory activity within a chamber with indirect air sampling will be used to capture bioaerosol with transmission potential. A high-flow, wet-walled cyclone collector will be used for both methods, ensuring the capture of a large proportion of the exhaled air volumes with extraction of the bioaerosol into liquid. The liquid specimen will then be subjected to live-cell fluorescence imaging to identify single viable Mtb bacilli based on DMN-trehalose probe incorporation patterns and differential bacterial cellular morphology [9].

Aim

The aim of this study is to identify viable Mtb bacilli in exhaled bioaerosol from individuals attending a TB clinic in Cape Town, South Africa. The specific objectives are divided into primary, secondary and exploratory.

Primary objective

  1. 1.

    To compare the prevalence proportions of Mtb-containing bioaerosol in sputum-positive and sputum-negative pulmonary TB cases (Groups A & B).

Secondary objectives

  1. 2.

    To quantify the numbers of viable Mtb organisms in bioaerosols per litre of air sampled and per nanolitre of bioaerosol particulate volume collected in both sputum-positive and sputum-negative pulmonary TB cases (Groups A & B).

Exploratory objectives

  1. 3.

    To determine the prevalence of Mtb-containing bioaerosols in TB suspects not diagnosed with clinical TB (Group C).

  2. 4.

    To determine the prevalence and numbers of viable Mtb in subjects receiving or not receiving IPT prophylaxis.

  3. 5.

    To determine the prevalence and numbers of viable Mtb in subjects with and without HIV co-infection.

  4. 6.

    To determine the prevalence and numbers of viable Mtb in subjects before and after TB therapy.

  5. 7.

    To determine the numbers of viable Mtb in bioaerosols collected by direct and indirect sampling.

  6. 8.

    To determine the ratio of Mtb genomes (ddPCR) to viable Mtb organisms (DMN-tre positivity) in Mtb-containing bioaerosols.

  7. 9.

    To identify which Mtb and host lipids are present in Mtb-containing bioaerosols.

Methods

Study design

This study will utilize a pragmatic, parallel group design (Fig. 1). All participants who meet the eligibility criteria will be invited to have bioaerosol sampling performed at the Aerobiology Research Centre (ARC) prior to TB investigations or treatment. An induced sputum sample will be collected, cultured and stored for future downstream studies before bioaerosol sampling. Classification into three groups will be based on the outcome of routine clinical practice at the TB clinic implementing the National TB Control Program (NTBCP) [10]. Group A will comprise patients with TB notification and sputum-based laboratory confirmation (GeneXpert positive sputum or sputum culture if performed); Group B will consist of patients with TB notification without sputum-based laboratory confirmation (physician diagnosed cases with GeneXpert negative sputum and negative sputum culture if performed); and Group C will contain individuals who are not notified. Repeat bioaerosol sampling will be conducted after 14 days on participants in all groups with initial bioaerosol samples containing viable Mtb. Group C individuals will be re-evaluated clinically, with induced sputa and repeated bioaerosol sampling at monthly intervals until two consecutive samples are negative or treatment is commenced.

Fig. 1
figure1

Study flow diagram

Study population

Consecutive patients with respiratory and/or constitutional symptoms suggestive of pulmonary TB who self-present to either of two local TB clinics will be offered recruitment into the study. The expected timeline to recruit the target number of patients is 1–2 years.

The eligibility criteria are:

  • age over 13 years (corresponding to increasing TB prevalence)

  • suspected TB

  • written, informed consent (parental consent and patient assent for those aged under 18 years)

Bioaerosol collection

Bioaerosol specimens will be collected by two sampling methods. In addition, exhaled breath will be simultaneously sampled for aerodynamic particle counting and the CO2 concentration of sampled air will be measured. Ozone sterilization and empty RASC sampling will be carried out between every participant to provide negative controls.

Direct sampling

A direct sampling protocol was developed by modifying the RASC [8]. Briefly, the RASC is a micro-environment designed for investigation of respiratory bioaerosol emissions from a single individual (see Fig. 2). This small personal clean space accommodates a seated participant during sampling. Modified from earlier descriptions, a metallic elliptical cone has been incorporated into which the participant can comfortably place their head at the larger open end. A unidirectional airflow is created by connection of a high-flow (250 l per minute) bespoke cyclone collector connected at the cone apex which extracts bioaerosol into a sterile phosphate-buffered solution. Air enters the collector via a tangential nozzle which generates a liquid cyclone with particle inertia leading to deposition of bioaerosol from the airstream onto the wet wall. The exit airflow from the cone will reaches a velocity of 12.5 m per second, enabling full collection of all expiratory respiratory particles including those generated during forceful coughing. Participants, who will be seated in the HEPA-filtered chamber, will be required to perform a specific breathing protocol with regular instruction by a study nurse. The protocol will consist of a series of 15 vigorous coughs every 20 s (5 mins), a period of tidal breathing (5 mins) and a further series of 15 bronchiole burst manoeuvres (BBM) every 20 s (5 mins). A BBM consists of two deep breaths with full exhalation on each breath. Figure 3 illustrates computational fluid dynamic modelling demonstrating complete sampling of high-velocity respiratory manoeuvres without backflow from the cone. Collection of entrained bioaerosol from the respiratory activities to a small volume of liquid enables non-culture-based analytical methods as described below [7].

Fig. 2
figure2

Modified RASC with author wearing a Tyvek™ non-woven fabric suit

Fig. 3
figure3

Computational fluid dynamic modelling of the flow velocity streams at maximum cough strength with a collection air-flow rate of 300 l per minute

Indirect sampling

Sampling of patient-derived respiratory bioaerosol during natural respiratory activity will also be performed in the same chamber without the use of the elliptical cone. This method is similar to a previous study [4] but has since been adapted to improve sensitivity [11]. In order to replicate a real-life transmission environment the entire volume of the RASC concentrates exhaled air leading to a variable dwell period with particle ageing prior to collection. This sampling takes place over a 60-min period following the direct sampling protocol. The high-flow cyclone collector continuously samples chamber air extracting bioaerosol into a sterile phosphate-buffered saline solution.

Microscopy-based detection of Mtb

The pellet from the centrifuged bioaerosol sample is stained using the solvatochromic trehalose probe, DMN-trehalose, which is incorporated as trehalose monomycolate into the cell walls of metabolically active Corynebacteriaceae (including Mycobacterium) by the antigen 85 protein complex [12]. After overnight incubation in media containing DMN-trehalose, the samples are washed and added to a novel nanowell device described in ref. [9]. The devices are sealed with adhesive film and centrifuged prior to visualization by fluorescence microscopy. Detection, enumeration and differentiation from debris of fluorescent bacilli is based on dye incorporation patterns and differential bacterial cellular morphology (cell length and width) [9].

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) detection of Mtb

DNA from Mtb bacilli is extracted using an in-house lysis buffer with subsequent pelleting of DNA (by centrifugation at 9000 x g for 10 min), discarding of supernatant, and resuspension in 20 μl of Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Given that ddPCR is relatively robust against inhibitors, no further DNA purification is required. The primer/probe combinations and reaction conditions for Mtb specific ddPCR have been described previously [4]. Serial dilutions of known concentrations of purified Mtb H37Rv genomic DNA are included as positive internal controls for ddPCR, and nuclease-free water is included as a negative control. Data generated from the ddPCR reaction are analyzed via the Umbrella pipeline [13] using only wells for which a minimum of 10,000 droplets have been detected.

Mass spectrometry detection of Mtb

The supernatant from the centrifuged bioaerosol sample is lyophilized followed by lipid extraction by the Folch method. Samples are introduced into an LTQ Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) via electrospray ionization by direct infusion. Positive and negative ion calibration solutions are used to optimize ion source conditions and mass calibration. For data acquisition, resolving power of 60,000 at 200 m/z is used for both positive and negative ions in the mass range 200–2000 m/z.

Statistical analysis

Historical clinic data suggest individuals suspected of TB divide into groups A, B, and C in the ratio 3:5:10. Based on this ratio, a sample size of 250 TB clinic attendees will give a 90% power to detect a 20% bioaerosol yield in Group B. Assuming 100% bioaerosol yield in Group A, this gives an absolute difference of 12.5% between sputum and bioaerosol yields in notified TB cases (two-sided p < 0.05).

Demographic (age, sex, BMI, HIV status) and microbiology data will be entered into a secure RedCap Database. To maintain confidentiality, participant identifying information will be removed. All analyses will be based on the groups to which patients are originally assigned. Analyses of the primary and secondary aims will be by comparison of paired proportions using McNemar’s test or comparison of independent proportions using a chi-square test. Mixed effect models can be used to adjust comparisons for any potential confounding variables.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/REF: 529/2019). Written informed consent including for publication of medical details will be obtained from the participants, with parental consent and participant assent for those under 18 years of age.

Discussion

The implications of bioaerosol positivity in people with suspected pulmonary TB differ depending on the subgroup sampled. Prevalence in patients with sputum-confirmed TB (Group A) establishes the sensitivity of bioaerosol sampling comparable with previous studies [3,4,5]. This will validate the optimized bioaerosol sampling system and allow a comparison between the direct and indirect aerosol generation methods. The direct method – performing a respiratory manoeuvre into a cone apparatus – captures nascent bioaerosol from the lung periphery and upper airway structures. The short time-interval between mouth and collector (approx. 40 msec) reduces losses of large particles by gravitational settling and maximizes the bioaerosol volume captured. Therefore, this approach aims to capture all Mtb organisms produced from the respiratory tract regardless of potential role in transmission. In contrast, the indirect capture method samples an aged bioaerosol product from the close breathing zone of the patient. The smaller size distribution of bioaerosol following drop-out of the larger diameters and desiccation to hygroscopic equilibrium has the capacity to penetrate the lungs of susceptible contacts. It follows, therefore, that this bioaerosol has the greatest propensity for disease transmission. Furthermore, enumeration of viable Mtb bacilli derived from this method may more closely reflect host infectivity, as similar investigations have related high numbers of Mtb colony forming units in cough aerosols to increased infection rates in household contacts [14]. Using the indirect method, we intend to explore the effect of treatment on organism numbers longitudinally by repeat sampling of patients with bioaerosol positivity in groups A and B. Also, by identifying the subset of HIV-infected individuals already receiving IPT at enrolment we will be able to assess the effect of isoniazid monotherapy on Mtb bioaerosol production.

To our knowledge, bioaerosol sampling in sputum-negative pulmonary TB cases has not been performed previously, despite evidence of transmission from this group [15,16,17,18]. We are therefore extending attempts to detect bioaerosol to patients with notified TB without sputum microbiological confirmation (Group B). Expectorated sputum, the primary specimen for pulmonary TB diagnosis, has significant limitations [19]. Globally, only 55% of pulmonary TB cases are bacteriologically confirmed by sputum testing [1]. The remainder, who are diagnosed by clinical symptoms or chest radiography, do not accumulate Mtb bacilli in sputum, or do not produce sputum, or do not expectorate adequately. Poor quality sputum samples are a particular problem in children and in HIV-infected individuals, leading to suboptimal diagnostic sensitivity. The finding of culture or Xpert MTB/RIF positivity in bronchoalveolar lavage from sputum-negative or sputum-scarce patients [20,21,22] suggests that Mtb is frequently present in the peripheral airways. The bronchiole fluid film burst method of bioaerosol generation [7] rapidly and non-invasively samples this biofluid with comparable biosafety to induced sputum. We aim to provide preliminary data on the clinically relevant role of bioaerosol sampling as a novel diagnostic specimen.

Identifying Mtb in bioaerosols from patients investigated but not treated for TB (Group C) indicates either a missed diagnosis or Mtb transmitters in the absence of discernible TB disease. Observations from multiple studies in different high-burden settings indicate that only 1–30% of new Mtb infections can be linked with known TB cases [23,24,25,26]. This is consistent with the existence of many unrecognized transmitters in TB endemic communities. We hypothesize that asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic individuals represent a major driver of transmission. However, it has been historically difficult to investigate the infectiousness of this subpopulation, partially owing to the dependence on sputum for diagnosis. Our intention to sample bioaerosols from individuals suspected of TB prior to investigation will opportunistically include many individuals not ultimately diagnosed with TB. Although these individuals will not be asymptomatic, they will nonetheless be Mtb transmitters who are not on treatment. As an exploratory aim, individuals identified with bioaerosol positivity will be re-sampled at weekly intervals (in addition to thorough clinical re-evaluation) to characterize the natural history of sub-clinical Mtb shedding.

This study aims to demonstrate the utility of bioaerosol sampling for TB diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring. High rates of successful bioaerosol Mtb detection across groups of TB clinic attendees would support the future development of bioaerosol sampling methods to inform TB control strategies. Widespread application may potentially reduce diagnostic uncertainty and enable improved case-finding with both individual and public health benefit.

Dissemination

The outcomes of the analysis in addition to the unprocessed data will be submitted for publication in open-source peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Change history

  • 24 August 2020

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Abbreviations

Mtb :

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

TB:

Tuberculosis

RASC:

Respiratory Aerosol Sampling Chamber

ARC:

Aerobiology Research Centre

NTBCP:

National TB Control Program

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

  2. 2.

    Turner RD, Chiu C, Churchyard GJ, Esmail H, Lewinsohn DM, Gandhi NR, Fennelly KP. Tuberculosis infectiousness and host susceptibility. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(Suppl 6):S636–43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/infdis/jix361.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fennelly KP, Martyny JW, Fulton KE, et al. Cough-generated aerosols of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a new method to study infectiousness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;169(5):604–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Patterson B, Morrow C, Singh V, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli in bio-aerosols from untreated TB patients [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. Gates Open Res. 2017;1:11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.12688/gatesopenres.12758.1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Williams CM, Cheah ES, Malkin J, et al. Face mask sampling for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in expelled aerosols. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e104921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Williams CM, Abdulwhhab M, Birring SS, De Kock E, Garton NJ, Townsend E, Pareek M, et al. Exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis output and detection of subclinical disease by face-mask sampling: prospective observational studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30707-8.

  7. 7.

    Patterson B, Wood R. Is cough really necessary for TB transmission? Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2019;117:31–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.tube.2019.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wood R, Morrow C, Barry CE 3rd, et al. Real-Time Investigation of Tuberculosis Transmission: Developing the Respiratory Aerosol Sampling Chamber (RASC). PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dinkele R, Gessner S, Koch A, et al. Capture and visualization of live Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli from tuberculosis bioaerosols. bioRxiv. 2019.12.23.887729. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1101/2019.12.23.887729.

  10. 10.

    http://www.kznhealth.gov.za/family/NTCP_Adult_TB_Guidelines_2014.pdf (Accessed 25th November 2019).

  11. 11.

    Patterson BJ, Dinkele R, Gessner S, Morrow C, Kamariza M, Bertozzi CR, et al. Sensitivity optimisation of tuberculosis bioaerosol sampling. MedRxiv. 2020. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1101/2020.05.03.20089425.

  12. 12.

    Kamariza M, Shieh P, Ealand CS, Peters JS, Chu B, Rodriguez-Rivera FP, et al. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum with a solvatochromic trehalose probe. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(430). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1126/scitranslmed.aam6310.

  13. 13.

    Jacobs BKM, Goetghebeur E, Vandesompele J, et al. Model-based classification for digital PCR: your umbrella for rain. Anal Chem. 2017;89:4461–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jones-Lopez EC, Namugga O, Mumbowa F, et al. Cough aerosols of Mycobacterium tuberculosis predict new infection: a household contact study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(9):1007–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Behr M, Warren S, Salamon H, Hopewell P, de Leon AP, Daley C, Small P. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients smear-negative for acid-fast bacilli. Lancet. 1999;353(9151):444–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03406-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hernández-Garduño E, Cook V, Kunimoto D, et al. Transmission of tuberculosis from smear negative patients: a molecular epidemiology study. Thorax. 2004;59:286–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tostmann A, Kik SV, Kalisvaart NA, Sebek MM, Verver S, Boeree MJ, van Soolingen D. Tuberculosis transmission by patients with smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in a large cohort in the Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(9):1135–42. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/591974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lawn SD, Edwards D, Wood R. Tuberculosis transmission from patients with smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(4):496–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1086/596550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Fennelly KP, Acuna-villaorduna C, Jones-lopez E, William G, Milton D. Microbial Aerosols: New Diagnostic Specimens for Pulmonary Infections. Chest. 2019. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.chest.2019.10.012.

  20. 20.

    Barnard DA, Irusen EM, Bruwer JW, Plekker D, Whitelaw AC, Deetlefs JD, Koegelenberg CFN. The utility of Xpert MTB/RIF performed on bronchial washings obtained in patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in a high prevalence setting. BMC Pulmonary Med. 2015;15(1):4–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12890-015-0086-z.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lee HY, Seong MW, Park SS, Hwang SS, Lee J, Park YS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF on bronchoscopy specimens in patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberculosis Lung Dis. 2013;17(7):917–21. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.5588/ijtld.12.0885.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kim, Y. W., Kwon, B. S., Lim, S. Y., Lee, Y. J., Cho, Y.-J., Yoon, H. I., Lee, J. H., et al. (2019). Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial washing in sputum-scarce or smear-negative cases with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomized study. Clin Microbiol Infect. Retrieved January 6, 2020, from https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.013.

  23. 23.

    Crampin AC, et al. Tuberculosis transmission attributable to close contacts and HIV status, Malawi. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:729–35. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3201/eid1205.050789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Glynn JR, et al. Whole genome sequencing shows a low proportion of tuberculosis disease is attributable to known close contacts in rural Malawi. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132840. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0132840.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Middelkoop K, et al. Transmission of tuberculosis in a south African community with a high prevalence of HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:53–61. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/infdis/jiu403.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Verver S, et al. Proportion of tuberculosis transmission that takes place in households in a high-incidence area. Lancet. 2004;363:212–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15332-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) are funding this research (R01AI147347–01). They did not provide any assistance to the study design, nor to writing of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RW conceived and designed the study, DFW, BP, WB, AK, FL, SG, RD and MG contributed to study design. BP led the drafting of the manuscript and RW, DFW, FC, FL, AK, SG edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Patterson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/REF: 529/2019). Written informed consent including for publication of medical details will be obtained from the participants, with parental consent and participant assent for those under 18 years of age.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: • The images for Figures 2 and 3 were reversed. The captions and references in the text were otherwise correct. • Reference 20 should have been removed and the text instead refer to ref 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patterson, B., Koch, A., Gessner, S. et al. Bioaerosol sampling of patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis: a study protocol. BMC Infect Dis 20, 587 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-020-05278-y

Download citation