Skip to main content

A genome epidemiological study of mycobacterium tuberculosis in subpopulations with high and low incidence rate in Guangxi, South China

Abstract

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by a bacterium called Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). China is the third in top 8 high TB burden countries and Guangxi is one of the high incidence areas in South China. Determine bacterial factors that affected TB incidence rate is a step toward Ending the TB epidemic.

Results

Genomes of M. tuberculosis cultures from a relatively high and low incidence region in Guangxi have been sequenced. 347 of 358(96.9%) were identified as M. tuberculosis. All the strains belong to Lineage 2 and Lineage 4, except for one in Lineage 1. We found that the genetic structure of the M. tuberculosis population in each county varies enormously. Low incidence rate regions have a lower prevalence of Beijing genotypes than other regions. Four isolates which harbored mutT4-48 also had mutT2-58 mutations. It is suggested that strains from the ancestors of modern Beijing lineage is circulating in Guangxi. Strains of modern Beijing lineage (OR=2.04) were more likely to acquire drug resistances than Lineage 4. Most of the lineage differentiation SNPs are related to cell wall biosynthetic pathways.

Conclusions

These results provided a higher resolution to better understand the history of transmission of M. tuberculosis from/to South China. And the incidence rate of tuberculosis might be affected by bacterial population structure shaped by demographic history. Our findings also support the hypothesis that Modern Beijing lineage originated in South China.

Peer Review reports

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that most often affect the lungs. Top eight high TB burden countries accounted for two thirds of new TB cases globally in 2019. One of the milestones of the WHO Ending TB Strategy is new TB cases drop 80% by 2030. China is the third in top 8 high TB burden countries and the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region is one of the high incidence provincial administrative region in South China. In our previous studies, we identified hot spots (high TB incidence rate areas) and cold spots(low TB incidence rate areas) in Guangxi by epidemiological methods and spatiotemporal scanning technology [1]. It is must be said that national and provincial assistance for a TB high incidence region (217.2 per 100,000 population) in north-central Guangxi and a low TB incidence rate region (31.2 per 100,000 population) in south-eastern Guangxi is almost the same (Fig. 1). In this context, determine bacterial factors that affected TB incidence rate is a way to optimize our investments in ending the TB epidemic. We have investigated some of the environmental factors in previous research. In this study, we hypothesize that the pathogenicity of M. tuberculosis strains in the hot and cold spot is different. we try to characterize the genetic background of the pathogen and figure out some potential associating factors.

Fig. 1
figure1

Approximate geographic locations of M. tuberculosis strains sampling sites in Guangxi, China. The fill color of provincial administrative regions of China next to Guangxi is light grey, the color of foreign countries is dark grey. The capitals of countries or provinces have marked by a red square. Red and brown round dots denote the counties in hot spot, green dots indicate cold-spot. Hot spot is a term in geology that referred to M. tuberculosis high incidence rate area and vice versa. The black dot is a county that did not identify as a hot or cold spot in our previous study

Result

Epidemiological characteristics of study participants

The people in the cold-spot mainly speak Cantonese as their first language. In the hot spots south-western Mandarin is generally adopted. Language differences reflect the distinct demographic histories of TB human hosts. Genome sequences of 358 bacterial cultures have been determined with WGS. The minimal sequencing depth of each sample is 100 × of H37Rv genome size. Eleven (11/358 [3.0%]) patient samples were identified as Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) or Mycobacterium tuberculosis contaminated with other respiratory pathogens. The remaining 357 samples were identified as M. tuberculosis strains. One from central Guangxi was identified as Lineage1.1.1.1(L1.1.1.1). 215 samples were recognized as L2 (East Asia) and 130 samples were recognized as L4 (Euro-American).

Cluster analysis by genome-wide SNPs

Maximum likelihood phylogeny was used to determine the population structure of 347 M. tuberculosis cultures. A single DR-TB case of L1.1.1.1 was detected in central Guangxi which was considered an endemic lineage in Vietnam only [2]. M. tuberculosis L2 in the Guangxi area is composed of L2.1(proto-Beijing) and L2.2(modern- and ancient-Beijing sub-lineage). Euro-American lineage consists of sub-lineages L4.2, L4.4, and L4.5. Some of the M. tuberculosis cultures appeared to be mixed infections (indicated by lineage specific SNPs, genotype heterozygosity and distance from leaf node to lineage common ancestor). At the very least, 4 Modern Beijing strains in L2.2 mixed with L4 or ancient Beijing lineage can be identified (Fig. 2). Ancestral Beijing strains in this study consist of Asia ancestral 1, 2 and 3. There are four sub-lineages of known classification in Modern Beijing strains, Asian African 1, 2, 3 and Pacific RD150. Only a single sample belongs to the Asian African 1 group. According to our study, over 30 strains assigned to the Modern Beijing lineage (harbored mutT2-58 mutations) cannot be subdivided into unified classifications [3]. We have developed two SNP markers to describe these strains. One SNP is 3943858 A/G which Pacific RD150 strains shared, the other one is 425871 C/G (Fig. 2). Interestingly, several strains are close to the ancient Beijing genotype and are considered as Modern Beijing lineage without mutT2-58 mutations. All these genomes share the mutation 3048912 C/G which is a common ancestral genetic marker of Modern Beijing lineage and group Bmyc26. The phylogeny shows that these M. tuberculosis strains’ evolutionary position is between recognized Modern and Ancient Beijing sub-lineages. Both mutT2-58(1286766 G/C, codon 58) and ogt-12 (1477596 C/T, codon 12) mutations cannot be detected in these strains, except sample 103239 which has an ogt-12 SNV (Fig. 3). It is almost impossible to obtain perfect data in clinical cultures [4]. Cross-contamination and/or mixed infection of multiple lineages of tuberculosis can affect the topology of the tree by Pseudo-homoplasy phylogenetic signal. To help with data interpretation, we used the heterozygosity of SNPs to estimate and label the problematic leafs.

Fig. 2
figure2

Genetic profiling of 347 M. tuberculosis strains from Guangxi, China. Phylogenetic tree reconstructed by maximum-likelihood algorithm using 26870 single-nucleotide polymorphism sites. Heatmap employing a cool-to-warm (value from 0 to 1) color scheme to represent the heterozygosity of every haploid genome. Heterozygosity of problematic leaf-nodes that have branch length and topological variation is high. Outer circles of heatmap marked drug resistance detected by in silico method. Lineage-specific genetic markers labeled in the inner circles used color squares. Dots that denote the leaf-nodes are corresponding to color dots in Fig. 1. And potential local circling clusters are highlighted in yellow

Fig. 3
figure3

Maximum-like Phylogeny of proto-Modern Beijing strains from Guangxi, China. Shows the evolutionary position of several proto-Modern Beijing strains. Branch color is corresponding to Fig. 2. Red squares beside the leaf-nodes indicates this sample has lineage specific ogt-12 SNV

M. tuberculosis genetic differences and lineages expansion in geographic spaces

The genetic population structure of M. tuberculosis in high and low incidence rate areas in Guangxi is quite different. The most prevalent M. tuberculosis lineage in this study is L2 which contributed 62% (215/346) of TB cases. On the other hand, the proportion of L4 in the low burden region is 47.8% (68/142). Our result shows that almost half of the patients in the southeast of Guangxi infected by strains in Europe-originated lineage. This result is quite different from the high incidence rate area of Guangxi which has a L4 proportion of 30.6% (45/147) and previous surveillance in China [5]. We combined the geographic areas (administrative area with several counties) of M. tuberculosis cultures origin and phylogeny. Two monophyletic groups with geographic links were observed which suggest that clonal expansion and circulation of Beijing lineage occurred within these counties. And three clusters are endemic in hot spot or cold spot regions only (Fig. 2). There is no recent transmission event that can be observed in this study by using a cgMLST scheme consisting of 2891 core M. tuberculosis gene [6] with 12 SNPs distance cut-off [7], also see (Fig. 2).

Antimicrobial resistance and pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis L2/L4

Modern Beijing lineage of M. tuberculosis exhibits more drug resistance than L4 strains. But the Ancient Beijing lineage has similar rate of susceptibility with L4. Compared to L4 strains endemic to South China, over 25.89% (29/112) of the Modern Beijing strains harbored drug-resistant mutations. This rate is statistically and significantly higher than the Ancient Beijing lineage of 14.58% (14/96). We have counted the genetic mutations of anti-tuberculosis drug resistance. The drug-resistant mutations of Ancient Beijing lineage is similar to L4 in Guangxi. M. tuberculosis Modern Beijing lineage has a significant increase of drug-resistant mutations than M. tuberculosis Lineage 4. The number of resistant mutations in Modern Beijing strains is about two times that of L4 or Ancient Beijing lineage (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 In-silico drug-resistance rate of dominated M. tuberculosis lineages, Guangxi, China, 20181
Table 2 Number of drug-resistance mutation by M. tuberculosis lineages, Guangxi, China, 20181

NTM and mixed infection of M. tuberculosis/NTM

Eleven samples were considered contaminated. We used ANIm and AF metrics [8] to identify these genomes. ANIm greater than 0.95 (or known as sequence similarity of 95%) and aligned fragment length (AF) over 60% of the reference genome were considered as the same bacterial species with reference. We have confirmed that 5 of 359 samples were clinically identified as M. tuberculosis but was actually NTM. And the rest of the samples were contaminated with bacteria from the respiratory tract and oral cavity Table 3 shows a list of NTM and mixed infection of M. tuberculosis/NTM.

Table 3 Genome binning and identification of NTM and mixed infection of M. tuberculosis/NTM from Guangxi, China, 2018

Discussion

We conducted a preliminary survey in Guangxi using the genome epidemiology method. Except for one strain of Lineage1.1.1.1 which originated from Vietnam, Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Guangxi belonged predominantly to sub-lineages L2.1(proto-Beijing), L2.2(Modern- and Ancient- Beijing), L4.2, L4.4 and L4.5. This result is similar to previous nation-wide genomic studies [5].

The bacterial population structure in Yulin is different from inland China even the hot spot in central-west Guangxi. Almost half of the strains in Yulin(cold spot) belong to M. tuberculosis L4 which originated in Europe [9]. A large number of migrants from south-east Guangxi moved to the Southeast Asian colonies of western powers, for example as economic migrants or victims of human traffickers, since the Ming dynasty (1368 - 1644 AD) this continued up to as recently as the 1950’s.Some of the Chinese laborers returned to their hometown in different phases of history. These Chinese expatriates might be carriers of M. tuberculosis L4 strains of Southeast Asia.

Mainly, the Ancient Beijing lineage in Guangxi consists of three sub-lineages including the Asian Ancestral 1, 2 and 3. And the Modern Beijing lineage in Guangxi consists of Asia Africa 2, Asia Africa 3 and two sub-lineages which is unclassified in the unified schema [3]. A few strains without sub-lineage specific markers might be attached to the root of sub-trees. Sub-trees of two unnamed Modern Beijing sub-lineages can be defined using SNPs 425871 C/G and 3943858 A/G as a specific marker, respectively. Pacific RD150 is a sub-group of the clade of 425871 C/G which is observed in Yulin only and that is specific for the Pacific region [10]. We also found some strains of intermediate genotype between the Modern and Ancient Beijing genotype (Fig. 2). These findings support a hypothesis that the Modern Beijing lineage of M. tuberculosis originated in South China [11].

Beijing genotypes could be considered as ‘native strains’ and dominated in mainland China, hence Lineage 4 of M. tuberculosis is an ‘exotic species’. Even though the transmission and pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis strains in Modern Beijing lineage are considered higher than L4 strains, the prevalence of M. tuberculosis L4 is almost the same as the Beijing genotype in the communities of returned Chinese expatriates in South China. Theoretically, L2 and L4 have the same ecological niche. M. tuberculosis strains in L4 might have stronger colonization ability in the newborn’s respiratory tract and it might be transmitted from close relatives.

Previous study has inferred that M. tuberculosis genes in cell wall envelop bio-genesis under strong diversifying selection and might be related to M. tuberculosis lineages specialization [12]. Our population study revealed that lineages differentiation of M. tuberculosis L2 and L4 in the molecular level are cell wall bio-synthesis related genes (Table 4). In other words, the composition of mycobacterial cell envelope or cell wall is a big biological difference between M. tuberculosis lineages. For instance, one of the SNPs we have observed in accD4 gene between L2 and L4 is 4254431 C/T. M.tuberculosis contains six ACCase (AccD1-6). Previous studies indicate that AccD4, AccD5, and AccD6 are important for cell envelope lipid biosynthesis and that its disruption leads to pathogen death. A synonymous mutation will not change the structure of the protein but would affect the amount of accD4 protein at the transcriptional level [16]. AccD4 was proposed to form Acyl-CoA carboxylases complex with AccD5 and accept propionyl-CoA as a substrate to produce methylmalonyl-CoA, which is the building block of mycocerosic acid [17].

Table 4 Estimation of SNPs that might have been subject to stabilizing or diversifying selection between M. tuberculosis Lineage 2 and 4, Guangxi, China, 2018

The role of the cell wall of M. tuberculosis has been involved in pathogenesis [18]. Molecular structural diversity on the surface of bacteria may affect interaction with human epithelial cells or macrophages. Another role of M. tuberculosis cell wall is conferring to resistance to many anti-tuberculosis agents.

Some of the previous studies inferred that the Beijing genotype of M. tuberculosis is less associated with drug resistance in South China [19, 20]. Meanwhile, surveillance overseas purposed that the Beijing genotype of M. tuberculosis is a risk factor for drug resistance [21]. Interestingly, our calculation suggested that strains in the Modern Beijing sub-lineage have more drug resistance mutations than Lineage4 in South China other than strains of the Ancient Beijing genotype. Conflicts of previous studies might be due to the ignorance of genetic segregation. Clonal expansion is a common phenomenon in M. tuberculosis transmission. In our preliminary surveillance, we observed several clusters circulating in counties or prefecture cities of Guangxi. From a public health aspect, although financial and technical support for counties in the hot spot and cold spot from provincial CDC are almost the same, TB burden is quite different. Our study purposed that the related high proportion of Beijing lineage(L2) in hot spot area might be one reason for the higher incidence rate.

Another clinically relevant issue is the misdiagnosis of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) infections. About 3% [11/358] of the culture-based laboratory M. tuberculosis diagnostics is wrong. The probable causes of misdiagnosis might be mixed infection/contamination and similarity of culture-based phenotypes determination.

In recent years, WGS-based approaches are more and more applied in M. tuberculosis research, especially in surveillance projects. It has become the standard technology for M. tuberculosis molecular epidemiology and the application in clinical settings is gaining acceptance (32). One of the considerations of infectious disease surveillance is the detection of recent transmission events [22]. There is no unified clustering method for genome-wide SNPs based typing yet [22]. In this work, we did not find any recent transmission event in this study by using a cgMLST scheme consisting of 2891 core M. tuberculosis genes and 20 SNPs cut-off [7]. The small sample size might be the reason for the failure to detect recent transmission clusters. The topic of recent transmission of M. tuberculosis in Guangxi should be investigated in further studies.

Another problem in whole-genome wide SNPs-based phylogenic analysis of M. tuberculosis is laboratory contamination and/or a mixture of M. tuberculosis lineages in clinical samples. For rapid outbreak tracking, public health laboratories often direct use materials submitted by the health care provider. These materials might be patient specimens or initial growth in Broth which would submit to the sequencing process without further isolation of bacteria strains. As a result, contaminations in the sequencing data can not be avoided. When the sample size is increased, the number of shared homogeneous SNP sites across the samples is decreased. If heterozygous SNPs are used, some conflicting phylogenetic signals would affect the phylogenetic tree, and pseudo-homoplastic clades would be introduced. These clades make data interpretation more difficult. To facilitate data interpretation, we used heterozygosity as a metric to indicate the problematic leaf-nodes in the tree, which leads to a more robust and solid conclusion. We noticed that some recent studies [23, 24] mentioned that they used heterozygous sites as high-confidence variations to perform tree construction. That may be a neglected problem in research laboratories because alternate data-set is available. It should be considered that the structure of the phylogenetic tree could be influenced by heterozygous sites.

The rate of resistance acquisition is determined by several factors including the population size, mutation rate and mutational target size [25]. L2 has been associated with greater drug resistance compared to L4 and the other ancient lineages [25]. The influence of strain’s genetic background on the rate of resistance acquisition has been much debated. Our results suggested that Modern-Beijing strains have greater antibiotic-resistance mutations than Ancient-Bejing strains and strains in L4. Theoretically, there are two possible explanations, one is the rate of resistance acquisition of Modern-Beijing lineage higher than others, another one is bacteria under the selection pressure of drugs and expanded via patient-to-patient transmission. We have no determine contribution of each of these two factors. But to prevent drug-resistant TB develop during treatment, it is reasonable that a high-resolution genotype of M. tuberculosis should be considered in the clinical setting when it is available.

Conclusions

We provided a higher resolution to better understand the history of the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in South China. Genetic structures of M. tuberculosis is different in hot and cold spot. Genetic background of M. tuberculosis may influence the TB burden. Geographical pathogen population structure which is shaped by demographic history and local transmission events should be a concern in public health policymaking.

Methods

Case inclusion and epidemiology data collection

We conducted a retrospective study to identify the bacterial genetic factors affecting TB incidence.The sample size of this study was determined based on a previous epidemiological survey. Patients above 5-years-old and diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis between January to June in 2018 from hot and cold spots were down-sampled. All the data entries of selected patients with culture confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis were retrieved from the National Notifiable Disease Reported System of China by a criterion as follows: cultured positive M. tuberculosis isolates from sputum samples corresponding to patients.

DNA extraction and WGS

DNA of positive M. tuberculosis culture isolates were extracted using a genetic sample kit (HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit, Magen Biotech Co. Ltd). 150-bp paired-end shotgun whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 359 isolates was performed on the Illumina (San Diego, California) NovaSeq platform using the Nextera XT DNA sample preparation kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Genome sequences analysis

M. tuberculosis WGS data files in the FASTQ format (2 ×150-bp reads) of each sample were trimmed with Trimmomatic [26] v0.3.2. Trimmomatic cut bases off the start of a read if quality score is under 30 and retain reads at a minimal length of 91 bp. Trim paired-end reads were aligned using Bowtie2 [27] v2.3.0 against the genome of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (Genbank accession: AL123456.3) with the parameter “–very-sensitive”. SNPs were identified using VarScan [28] v2.3.8 and SAMtools [29] v1.3.1, variations with coverage under 30 × or the minimal frequency of homozygote below 0.99 were ignored. Further filter was applied to all the VCF files using bcf tools v1.9. In our filter criteria, heterozygous SNP or SNP within 5 bp of an indel was filtered. SNPs with genotype quality below 255 or below a minimum of 90% of the median coverage in each bam file were discarded [30]. Variations in x the coding sequence of proteins that contain PE or PPE motifs [31] were characterized by Genebank’s annotation and known drug resistance genes were discarded. Anti-TB drug resistance SNPs were identified using TB-Profiler [32] and an additional database which was in-house curated. Finally, 26869 SNPs remained after filters. VCF-kit [33] was used to concentrate all the remaining SNPs into pseudo-sequences for phylogeny analysis. All of these SNPs were loaded into a MongoDB database and performed queries using Perl script with MongoDB driver.

A maximum-likelihood phylogeny was reconstructed using RAxML [34] v8.1.9 with a general time reversible (GTR) nucleotide substitution model and 100 bootstrap replicates. De novo assembly of reads used SPAdes [35] v3.13.0, and the binning used MyCC.py [36]. Bacterial species of binned contigs were identified by ANIm with a cut-off 0.95 using in-house scripts. All statistical analyses were performed in R-language v3.4.4 unless otherwise stated. M. tuberculosis lineages were assigned and Beijing strains sub-lineages used Coll’s 62 SNPs schema [37]. In silico spoligotyping used SpoTyping-v2.0 [38]. Data visualization used the online tool iTOL [39].

Availability of data and materials

The gene sequences have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive in Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG) Data Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession numbers PRJCA002021 and are publicly accessible at https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa.

References

  1. 1

    Cui Z, Lin D, Chongsuvivatwong V, Zhao J, Lin M, Ou J, Zhao J. Spatiotemporal patterns and ecological factors of tuberculosis notification: A spatial panel data analysis in Guangxi, China. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14(5):e0212051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Holt KE, McAdam P, Thai PVK, Thuong NTT, Ha DTM, Lan NN, Lan NH, Nhu NTQ, Hai HT, Ha VTN, Thwaites G, Edwards DJ, Nath AP, Pham K, Ascher DB, Farrar J, Khor CC, Teo YY, Inouye M, Caws M, Dunstan SJ. Frequent transmission of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing lineage and positive selection for the EsxW Beijing variant in Vietnam. Nat Genet. 2018; 50(6):849–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Shitikov E, Kolchenko S, Mokrousov I, Bespyatykh J, Ischenko D, Ilina E, Govorun V. Evolutionary pathway analysis and unified classification of east asian lineage of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):9227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Wyllie DH, Robinson ER, Peto T, Crook DW, Ajileye A, Rathod P, Allen R, Jarrett L, Smith EG, Walker AS, Forbes BA. Identifying Mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Laboratory Cross-Contamination during Mycobacterial Sequencing Programs. J Clin Microbiol. 2018; 56(11):e00923–18. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/JCM.00923-18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Liu Q, Ma A, Wei L, Pang Y, Wu B, Luo T, Zhou Y, Zheng H-X, Jiang Q, Gan M, Zuo T, Liu M, Yang C, Jin L, Comas I, Gagneux S, Zhao Y, Pepperell CS, Gao Q. China’s tuberculosis epidemic stems from historical expansion of four strains of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018; 2(12):1982–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Kohl TA, Harmsen D, Rothgänger J, Walker T, Diel R, Niemann S. Harmonized genome wide typing of tubercle bacilli using a web-based gene-by-gene nomenclature system. EBioMedicine. 2018; 34:131–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Meehan CJ, Moris P, Kohl TA, Pečerska J, Akter S, Merker M, Utpatel C, Beckert P, Gehre F, Lempens P, Stadler T, Kaswa MK, Kühnert D, Niemann S, de Jong BC. The relationship between transmission time and clustering methods in mycobacterium tuberculosis epidemiology. EBioMedicine. 2018; 37:410–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K, Kyrpides NC, Pati A. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(14):6761–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Brynildsrud OB, Pepperell CS, Suffys P, Grandjean L, Monteserin J, Debech N, Bohlin J, Alfsnes K, Pettersson JO-H, Kirkeleite I, Fandinho F, da Silva MA, Perdigao J, Portugal I, Viveiros M, Clark T, Caws M, Dunstan S, Thai PVK, Lopez B, Ritacco V, Kitchen A, Brown TS, van Soolingen D, O’Neill MB, Holt KE, Feil EJ, Mathema B, Balloux F, Eldholm V. Global expansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 4 shaped by colonial migration and local adaptation. Sci Adv. 2018; 4(10):eaat5869. Sourced from Microsoft Academic - https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/2898083195.

  10. 10

    Merker M, Blin C, Mona S, Duforet-Frebourg N, Lecher S, Willery E, et al. Evolutionary history and global spread of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing lineage. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(3):242–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Yin Q-q, Liu H-c, Jiao W-w, Li Q-j, Han R, Tian J-l, Liu Z-g, Zhao X-q, Li Y-j, Wan K-l, Shen A-d, Mokrousov I. Evolutionary history and ongoing transmission of phylogenetic sublineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype in China. Sci Rep. 2016; 6(1):34353.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Namouchi A, Didelot X, Schöck U, Gicquel B, Rocha EPC. After the bottleneck: Genome-wide diversification of the mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by mutation, recombination, and natural selection. Genome Res. 2012; 22(4):721–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    DeJesus MA, Gerrick ER, Xu W, Park SW, Long JE, Boutte CC, Rubin EJ, Schnappinger D, Ehrt S, Fortune SM, Sassetti CM, Ioerger TR, Stallings CL, Manoil C, Lampe D. Comprehensive Essentiality Analysis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Genome via Saturating Transposon Mutagenesis. mBio. 2017; 8(1):e02133–16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1128/mBio.02133-16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bateman A, Martin M-J, Orchard S, Magrane M, Agivetova R, Ahmad S, Alpi E, Bowler-Barnett EH, Britto R, Bursteinas B, Bye-A-Jee H, Coetzee R, Cukura A, Silva AD, Denny P, Dogan T, Ebenezer T, Fan J, Castro LG, Garmiri P, Georghiou G, Gonzales L, Hatton-Ellis E, Hussein A, Ignatchenko A, Insana G, Ishtiaq R, Jokinen P, Joshi V, Jyothi D, Lock A, Lopez R, Luciani A, Luo J, Lussi Y, MacDougall A, Madeira F, Mahmoudy M, Menchi M, Mishra A, Moulang K, Nightingale A, Oliveira CS, Pundir S, Qi G, Raj S, Rice D, Lopez MR, Saidi R, Sampson J, Sawford T, Speretta E, Turner E, Tyagi N, Vasudev P, Volynkin V, Warner K, Watkins X, Zaru R, Zellner H, Bridge A, Poux S, Redaschi N, Aimo L, Argoud-Puy G, Auchincloss A, Axelsen K, Bansal P, Baratin D, Blatter M-C, Bolleman J, Boutet E, Breuza L, Casals-Casas C, de Castro E, Echioukh KC, Coudert E, Cuche B, Doche M, Dornevil D, Estreicher A, Famiglietti ML, Feuermann M, Gasteiger E, Gehant S, Gerritsen V, Gos A, Gruaz-Gumowski N, Hinz U, Hulo C, Hyka-Nouspikel N, Jungo F, Keller G, Kerhornou A, Lara V, Mercier PL, Lieberherr D, Lombardot T, Martin X, Masson P, Morgat A, Neto TB, Paesano S, Pedruzzi I, Pilbout S, Pourcel L, Pozzato M, Pruess M, Rivoire C, Sigrist C, Sonesson K, Stutz A, Sundaram S, Tognolli M, Verbregue L, Wu CH, Arighi CN, Arminski L, Chen C, Chen Y, Garavelli JS, Huang H, Laiho K, McGarvey P, Natale DA, Ross K, Vinayaka CR, Wang Q, Wang Y, Yeh L-S, Zhang J, Ruch P, Teodoro D. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49:480–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kapopoulou A, Lew JM, Cole ST. The mycobrowser portal: a comprehensive and manually annotated resource for mycobacterial genomes. Tuberculosis. 2011; 91(1):8–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Brule CE, Grayhack EJ. Synonymous codons: Choose wisely for expression. Trends Genet. 2017; 33(4):283–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Lin T-W, Melgar MM, Kurth DG, Swamidass SJ, Purdon J, Tseng T, Gago GM, Baldi P, Gramajo HC, Tsai SC. Structure-based inhibitor design of accd5, an essential acyl-coa carboxylase carboxyltransferase domain of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(9):3072–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Jackson M. The Mycobacterial Cell EnvelopeŮLipids. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014; 4(10):a021105. Sourced from Microsoft Academic - https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/2152257820.

  19. 19

    Yang C, Luo T, Sun G, Qiao K, Sun G, DeRiemer K, Mei J, Gao Q. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing Strains Favor Transmission but Not Drug Resistance in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 55(9):1179–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Zhao L-L, Li M-C, Liu H-C, Xiao T-Y, Li G-L, Zhao X-Q, Liu Z-G, Wan K-L. Beijing genotype of mycobacterium tuberculosis is less associated with drug resistance in South China. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019; 54(6):766–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Loutet MG, Davidson JA, Brown T, Dedicoat M, Thomas HL, Lalor MK. Acquired resistance to antituberculosis drugs in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, 2000?2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018; 24(3):524–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Meehan CJ, Goig GA, Kohl TA, Verboven L, Dippenaar A, Ezewudo M, Farhat MR, Guthrie JL, Laukens K, Miotto P, Ofori-Anyinam B, Dreyer V, Supply P, Suresh A, Utpatel C, van Soolingen D, Zhou Y, Ashton PM, Brites D, Cabibbe AM, de Jong BC, de Vos M, Menardo F, Gagneux S, Gao Q, Heupink TH, Liu Q, Loiseau C, Rigouts L, Rodwell TC, Tagliani E, Walker TM, Warren RM, Zhao Y, Zignol M, Schito M, Gardy J, Cirillo DM, Niemann S, Comas I, Rie AV. Whole genome sequencing of mycobacterium tuberculosis: current standards and open issues. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019; 17(9):533–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Faksri K, Xia E, Ong RT-H, Tan JH, Nonghanphithak D, Makhao N, Thamnongdee N, Thanormchat A, Phurattanakornkul A, Rattanarangsee S, Ratanajaraya C, Suriyaphol P, Prammananan T, Teo Y-Y, Chaiprasert A. Comparative whole-genome sequence analysis of mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from tuberculous meningitis and pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):4910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Tantivitayakul P, Ruangchai W, Juthayothin T, Smittipat N, Disratthakit A, Mahasirimongkol S, Viratyosin W, Tokunaga K, Palittapongarnpim P. Homoplastic single nucleotide polymorphisms contributed to phenotypic diversity in mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):8024.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Gygli SM, Borrell S, Trauner A, Gagneux S. Antimicrobial resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis: mechanistic and evolutionary perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017; 41(3):354–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(15):2114–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(4):357–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, Miller CA, Mardis ER, Ding L, Wilson RK. Varscan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012; 22(3):568–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. The sequence alignment/map format and samtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(16):2078–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Coll F, Preston M, Guerra-Assunção JA, Hill-Cawthorn G, Harris D, Perdigão J, Viveiros M, Portugal I, Drobniewski F, Gagneux S, Glynn JR, Pain A, Parkhill J, McNerney R, Martin N, Clark TG. Polytb: a genomic variation map for mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2014; 94(3):346–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Chernyaeva E, Rotkevich M, Krasheninnikova K, Yurchenko A, Vyazovaya A, Mokrousov I, Solovieva N, Zhuravlev V, Yablonsky P, O’Brien SJ. Whole-genome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients with tuberculous spondylitis, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018; 24(3):579–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Phelan JE, O’Sullivan DM, Machado D, Ramos J, Oppong YEA, Campino S, O’Grady J, McNerney R, Hibberd ML, Viveiros M, Huggett JF, Clark TG. Integrating informatics tools and portable sequencing technology for rapid detection of resistance to anti-tuberculous drugs. Genome Med. 2019; 11(1):1–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Cook DE, Andersen EC. VCF-kit: assorted utilities for the variant call format. Bioinformatics. 2017; 33(10):1581–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(9):1312–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. Spades: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012; 19(5):455–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Lin H-H, Liao Y-C. Accurate binning of metagenomic contigs via automated clustering sequences using information of genomic signatures and marker genes. Sci Rep. 2016; 6(1):24175.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Coll F, McNerney R, Guerra-Assunção JA, Glynn JR, Perdigão J, Viveiros M, Portugal I, Pain A, Martin N, Clark TG. A robust SNP barcode for typing Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Nat Commun. 2014; 5(1):4812–4812.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Xia E, Teo Y-Y, Ong RT-H. SpoTyping: fast and accurate in silico Mycobacterium spoligotyping from sequence reads. Genome Med. 2016; 8(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(W1):W256–W259. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/nar/gkz239.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Rejean Ruiel Regis Sawh who is from Peking University Health Science Center for proofreading.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81760603].

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Authors’ contributions

D.Lin conceived the research. J.Ou, L.Huang performed the experiments. Z.Cui, Y.Wang and J.Wang analyzed the data. D.Lin wrote the manuscript with input from Z.Cui, J.Wang, J.Ou, L.Huang and Y.Wang. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

Authors’ information

Dr. Lin is a chief physician who has worked in the Department of Tuberculosis Control, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China. Now Dr. Lin is in the Department of Nutrition and School Health, Guangxi CDC. His research focuses on tuberculosis infection control and molecular epidemiology.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dingwen Lin or Zhezhe Cui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention (GW-2017-0001), and follows the ethical principles of World Medical Association (WMA)’s Declaration of Helsinki (DoH). Committe also approved the informed consent procedure. Written informed consents to participates have been provided in this study. All the records were anonymized.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Y.Wang and J.Wang are colleagues in Zeta Biosciences. Other authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, D., Wang, J., Cui, Z. et al. A genome epidemiological study of mycobacterium tuberculosis in subpopulations with high and low incidence rate in Guangxi, South China. BMC Infect Dis 21, 840 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-021-06385-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Molecular epidemiology
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis
  • China
  • Drug resistance
  • Genetic evolution