Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalence of anogenital warts

From: Systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of genital warts

Study

Country / year

Population, setting and age groups

Prevalence %

   

Males

Females

Overall

Data based on retrospective administrative databases or medical chart reviews

Marra et al., 2009 [32]

Canada (British Columbia) / 2006

Setting: physicians, hospitals and STI clinics (province-wide)

0.16

0.14

0.15

Denominator: general population

Age: all ages

Kliewer et al., 2009 [33]

Canada (Manitoba) / 2004

Setting: physician offices and hospitals (province-wide)

0.17

0.13

0.15

Population: general population

Age: all ages

Vittori et al., 2008 [28]

Italy / 2005

Setting: random sample of 78 gynecologists stratified by geographic region

NA

0.6

NA

Population: female population visiting gynecologists

Age: 14–64 years

Castellsague et al., 2009 [29]

Spain / 2005

Setting: representative sample of dermatologists, gynecologists and urologists in the public healthcare setting from 6 autonomous regions

0.20

0.16

0.18

Population: general population (68% of total Spanish population)

Age: 14–64 years

Data based on prospectively collected physician reports

Mariani et al., 2011 [47]

Italy / 2010

Setting: 45 extra-hospital gynecologists in gynecological ambulatories stratified by geographic region

NA

0.56

NA

Population: female population listed with the above GPs (N = 16,410)

Age: 15–64 years

Pasciullo et al., 2011 [41]

Italy / 2009

Setting: geographically representative sample of 650 GPs

0.06

0.03

0.05

Population: population listed with the above GPs (N = 959,778)

Age: ≥15 years

Lee et al., 2010 [46]

South Korea / 2008

Setting: gynecological clinics in the top 6 metropolitan cities

NA

0.14

NA

Population: female patients visiting the above gynecological clinics (N = 117,381)

Age: all ages

Data based on genital examinations of samples from the general population

Sellors et al., 2000 [48]

Canada (Ontario) / 1998-1999

Setting: family practices for cytologic screening randomly selected in proportion to the regional population

NA

1.10

NA

Population: female population attending cervical Pap screening with the above family physicians (N = 909)

Age: 15–49 years

Nyári et al., 2004 [49]

Hungary (Southeast) / 2000

Setting: outpatient gynecology clinics

NA

4.03

NA

Population: randomly selected asymptomatic female population attending the above gynecology clinics (N = 397)

Age: mean 35.5 years (SD 9.7)

Jimenez-Vieyra, 2010 [50]

Mexico (Mexico City) / 2002–09

Setting: sexual health clinic

NA

3.20

NA

Population: female population attending opportunistic cervical Pap screening at above sexual health clinic (N = 3,232*)

Age: 15–54 years

Vaccarella et al., 2006 [45]

Mexico / 2003-2004

Setting: 27 public clinics stratified by geographic region

5.1†

NA

NA

Population: male population seeking vasectomy in the above clinics (N = 779)

Age: mean 34.0 years

Garcia et al., 2004 [51]

Peru / 1997-98

Setting: CBOs (mother’s clubs) from 18 districts

NA

2.40

NA

Population: rural female population from the above mother’s clubs (N = 752)

Age: 18–67 years

Nyitray et al., 2008 [44]

USA (Tucson and Tampa) / NA

Setting: prospective HPV epidemiology study

4.10

NA

NA

Population: heterosexual men from general population participating in the above study (N = 222)

Age: 18–40 years

Lan et al., 2008 [52]

Vietnam (Bavi district) / 2006

Setting: gynecological examinations performed by physicians

NA

0.20

NA

Population: married rural women randomly recruited from the general population (N = 1,012)

  

Age: 18–49 years

   
  1. AGWs anogenital warts, GP general practitioner, GWs genital warts, N number of individuals examined or followed, NA not available, SD standard deviation, STI sexually transmitted infection.
  2. * Number of Pap tests performed.
  3. † Penile condyloma acuminata.