Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariable analysis of risk factors for T. solium cysticercosis at household level

From: Risk factors, perceptions and practices associated with Taenia solium cysticercosis and its control in the smallholder pig production systems in Uganda: a cross-sectional survey

Factor

Number of pigs

Seropositive pigs (%)

p-value

Odds (95% CI)

Level of education

 None

114

11(9.7)

0.073

0.449(0.187–1.079)

 Primary

548

68(12.4)

0.06

0.452(0.197–1.033)

 Secondary

348

40(11.5)

0.089

0.593(0.325–1.083)

 Tertiarya

83

16(19.3)

-

-

Training in pig management

 Yesa

488

62(12.7)

-

-

 No

603

73(12.1)

0.397

0.728(0.348–1.52)

Water sources

 Unprotecteda

419

37(8.8)

-

-

 Protected

677

98(14.5)

0.008

0.583(0.391–0.870)

Boil water

 Alwaysa

638

79(12.4)

-

-

 Never

453

56(12.4)

0.992

1.002(0.695–1.444)

Eating pork

 At least once a month

640

81(12.7)

0.281

0.653(0.3–1.418)

 After a month

204

20(9.8)

0.644

0.904(0.587–1.39)

 Nevera

246

34(13.8)

-

-

Slaughter at home

 Once a year

101

8(16.5)

0.200

0.629(0.31–1.278)

 After a year

21

4(19)

0.157

0.583(0.276–1.231)

 Nevera

957

123(12.9)

-

-

Inspection on slaughter

 Alwaysa

11

0

-

-

 Sometimes

20

3(15)

0.59

0.687(0.175–2.692)

 Never

111

12(10.8)

0.999

0.000

Presence of latrine

 No

133

3(6)

0.384

0.729(0.358–1.484)

 Yesa

1041

132(12.7)

-

-

Unable to use latrine

 Yes

595

90(15.1)

0.006

0.581(0.395–0.855)

 Noa

458

43(9.4)

-

-

Know transmission cycle

 Yes

121

26(21.5)

0.002

0.463(0.287–0.746)

 Noa

975

109(11.2)

-

-

  1. aReference variable