Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression models to determine association of nutritional status with helminthic infections

From: A comparative cross-sectional study of prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminthic infection between healthy and severe acutely malnourished pre-school aged children in Kano, Northern Nigeria

Helminthic groups

Univariate modelc

Multivariate modeld

Age and socioeconomic status adjusted modele

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Odds ratio (95% CI)

All helminths Combinedf

 Malnourished

1.44 (0.54 3.84)

1.10bg (0.38 3.21)

1.33 (0.44 4.07)

 Well-nourished

1.00

1.00

1.00

Roundworm

 Malnourished

1.00g (0.32 3.14)

0.83b (0.24 2.91)

0.84 (0.23 3.06)

 Well-nourished

1.00

1.00

1.00

Hookworm

 Malnourished

3.02 (0.31 29.19)

3.53ag (0.32 38.83)

3.53a (0.32 38.83)

 Well-nourished

1.00

1.00

1.00

  1. CI Confidence interval
  2. a-Model adjusted for age and socioeconomic status
  3. b- Model adjusted for age alone
  4. c- Univariate models are crude logistic models with only study participants’ nutritional status as a single covariate
  5. d- Multivariate models are best fitting adjusted logistic regression models (Models were adjusted for age, socioeconomic status or both covariates and the model with the best fit statistic was reported)
  6. e- Age and socioeconomic status adjusted model are models adjusted for both age and socioeconomic status irrespective of fit statistics
  7. f- All helminth combined group consists of Roundworm, Hookworm and Whipworm
  8. g- Best fitting model