Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of published meta-analyses of Xpert® MTB/RIF for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis

From: Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author/Year

Search period

Groups of children included

Number of studies included in the meta-analysis

Number of specimens included

Specimen types

Accuracy of Xpert

All samples

Lymph node TB

TB meningitis

Pleural TB

Bone or joint TB

Chang, 2012

Up to Oct 1, 2011

No classification by age

7

1058

Multiple forms combined

Sensitivity 80.4%; Specificity 86.1%

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Denkinger, 2014

Up to Oct 15, 2013

10 studies included children

18

4461

Lymph node, CSF, Pleural fluid

Sensitivity 97.4%; Specificity not reported

Sensitivity 83%; Specificity 94%

Sensitivity 81%; Specificity 98%

Sensitivity 46%; Specificity 99%

Not reported

Maynard-Smith, 2014

Up to Nov 6, 2013

3 studies enrolled only children, 3 included all age-groups

27

6026

Lymph node, CSF, Other forms

Median sensitivity 83% (IQR, 68–94%; median specificity 98% (IQR, 89–94%)

Sensitivity 96%;

Specificity 93%

Median sensitivity

85% (IQR, 75–100%);

Median

specificity 100%

(IQR, 98–100%)

Sensitivity 34%;

Specificity 98%

Not reported

Penz, 2015

Up to Aug 15, 2014

No classification by age

36

9523

Lymph node, CSF, Other forms

Sensitivity 77%; Specificity 97%

Sensitivity 87%;

Specificity 92%

Sensitivity 69%;

Specificity 97%

Sensitivity 37%;

Specificity 98%

Not reported

Sehgal, 2016

Up to Aug 31, 2015

No classification by age

24

2486

Pleural fluid

Pleural fluid samples only

Not reported

Not reported

Sensitivity 51.4%; Specificity 98.6%

Not reported

Li S, 2017

Up to June 20, 2015

No classification by age

26

Not reported

Multiple forms combined

Sensitivity 80%; Specificity 97%

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Kohli, 2018

Up to Aug 7, 2017

30 studies included children

66

16213

Lymph node, CSF, Other forms

Varied across different types of specimens

Sensitivity 87.6%; Specificity 86.0%

Sensitivity 71.1%; Specificity 98.0%

Sensitivity 50.9%; Specificity 99.2%

Sensitivity 97.2% (fluid), 91.8%(tissue); Specificity 90.2% (fluid), 82.0% (tissue)

Yu G, 2019

Up to Jul 6, 2018

No classification by age

21

1629

Lymph node

Lymph node samples only

Sensitivity 84%; Specificity 91%

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Shen Y, 2019

Up to May 7, 2019

No classification by age

14

1884

Bone or joint samples

Bone and joint samples only

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Sensitivity 82% (pus), 84% (tissue); Specificity 99% (pus), 98% (tissue)

Current study

Up to Jul 16, 2019

Only samples taken from children were included

8

597

Lymph node, CSF, Other forms

Sensitivity 71.3%; Specificity 97.2%

Sensitivity 80.2%; Specificity 94.0%

Sensitivity 41.7%; Specificity 98.7%

Meta-analysis could not be performed

Meta-analysis could not be performed

  1. EPTB extrapulmonary tuberculosis, TB tuberculosis, IQR interquartile range, CSF cerebrospinal fluid