Skip to main content

Monkeypox virus-associated meningoencephalitis diagnosed by detection of intrathecal antibody production

Abstract

Background

In the 2022 mpox-outbreak most patients presented with mild symptoms. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement has previously been described as a rare and severe complication of mpox; however, diagnostic findings in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and neuroimaging studies have only been reported in one case previously.

Case presentation

We report a previously healthy 37-year-old man with mpox complicated by encephalitis. He first presented with painful skin lesions and genital ulcers; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the lesions was positive for mpox. Twelve days later he was admitted with fever and confusion. Neuroimaging and CSF analysis indicated encephalitis. The CSF was PCR-negative for monkeypox virus but intrathecal antibody production was detected. He spontaneously improved over a few days course and recovered fully.

Conclusions

This case of mpox-associated encephalitis shows that CNS involvement in mpox infection may have a relatively mild clinical course, and that detection of intrathecal antibody production can be used to establish the diagnosis if CSF monkeypox virus-PCR is negative.

Peer Review reports

Background

Since May 2022, nearly 90,000 cases of mpox have been reported within a global outbreak [1], with the major proportion of cases affecting men who have sex with men [2]. Apart from this epidemiological pattern of transmission, cases in the global outbreak frequently show a different clinical presentation from that previously described, with a predominance of anogenital lesions, as well as manifestations such as penile oedema, proctitis, and severe pain from skin and mucosal lesions [3]. The course of mpox is usually relatively benign and self-limiting, although within the current outbreak around 6% of patients have required hospitalization [2]. However, the spectrum of severe disease manifestations represents a current knowledge gap. A recent meta-analysis on neurological and psychiatric presentations of mpox reported seizures, confusion, and encephalitis in < 3% of infected individuals [4], but the studies have been small and only one included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) results and neuroimaging [5].

Case presentation

The patient was a 37-year-old previously healthy man with a history of primary syphilis who received regular medication with Emtricitabine/Tenofovir as HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis. He presented to an outpatient department with a one-day history of painful genital skin lesions and oral ulcers and reported a casual sexual contact with a man in Spain nine days earlier. Mpox was suspected, and samples obtained from oral and genital lesions were positive for monkeypox virus by PCR (Supplementary material 1). The patient was afebrile and did not show signs of systemic infection. Symptomatic treatment (topical anaesthetics, paracetamol, and ibuprofen) was prescribed.

Over the next week, the patient experienced gradual improvement. On day 9–10 after symptom onset, however, he developed fever, sore throat, headache, and fatigue. On day 12, mental confusion appeared. The patient was found in a parked car, could not provide details about himself, and was brought to the emergency department by ambulance. In the emergency room, he was febrile (39 ºC) with normal respiratory rate. Blood pressure was 120/80 mmHg and heart rate was 92 beats per minute. The neck was supple. He was fully conscious but appeared confused and responded inadequately to questions about his symptoms and previous activities during the day. Neurological examination revealed normal cranial nerve function and intact strength and sensation, and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 14/15. The previously described genital and oral ulcers as well as a few additional lesions on the lower extremities and trunk were noted. Computed tomography of the brain was performed with normal findings. Analysis of CSF showed elevated mononuclear cells (22 × 10^6/L) suggestive of aseptic meningitis (Table 1). The patient was admitted, and empirical treatment with intravenous acyclovir was initiated.

Table 1 Microbiological investigations during hospital admission and at follow-up

On the second day after admission, the patient’s condition worsened with psychomotor deceleration and increasing confusion. He moved all extremities spontaneously and had localized pain but gave no verbal or non-verbal response, and a repeated assessment revealed a GCS of 9/15. No focal neurological deficits were observed.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed signs of encephalitis with bilateral symmetrical restricted diffusion in the cingulated gyrus and cortical regions of the insula (Fig. 1). An electroencephalogram showed generalized slow waves without epileptiform activity.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. MRI showed a high signal on diffusion weighted imaging in gyrus cinguli, insula and bilateral cortex. Due to agitation, some pictures hade movement artefacts and the MRI were disrupted before contrast injection

The next morning, the patient was awake and responsive, although still showing slight signs of confusion. On day four of admission, he was fully oriented and adequate. A second lumbar puncture was performed. HSV PCR was repeatedly negative, and acyclovir was discontinued. The patient was discharged from hospital five days after admission while reporting mild headache and fatigue.

After discharge, the patient was followed by regular phone calls. He reported complete recovery from day 30, which was confirmed by clinical examination at an outpatient follow-up visit on day 45.

Microbiological investigations

PCRs specific for monkeypox virus (MPXV) and orthopox virus (OPXV) in the CSF from both sampling time points were negative, as well as PCRs for other neurotropic pathogens (Table 1). Serological analysis was performed by immunofluorescence using MPXV-infected confluent Vero cells. Serum and CSF samples were analysed and serum/CSF ratio was calculated. The presence of EBV antibodies was analysed with the same methodology in order to be able to further differentiate passive transfer of antibodies from signs of intrathecal production of antibodies.

Serology for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) showed a weakly positive IgG signal in serum but with negative IgM, and the CSF showed no signs of production of intrathecal antibodies. Borrelia burgdorferi serology was positive for IgG in serum, but both IgG and IgM were negative in the CSF. Tests for autoimmune encephalitis were negative. Further, serology for HIV and hepatis B and C virus were negative. Syphilis serology showed negative VDRL but positive TPPA in both serum and CSF, but with a serum/CSF ratio of 1280 indicating passive antibody transfer rather than local production in the CNS compartment. Serology for HIV was performed 6 and eleven weeks after the hospital admission, with negative results. Microbiological testing is summarized in Table 2, clinical course in Fig. 2.

Table 2 Microbiological testing on different days in relation to the day of diagnosis
Fig. 2
figure 2

Timeline for the symptoms and investigations performed

Discussion

This case demonstrates an example of the spectrum of symptoms of mpox infection and the diagnostic challenges encountered in patients showing signs of CNS involvement. In our patient, monkeypox virus was not identified by repeated PCR in the CSF. Tests for a broad range of alternative causes of meningoencephalitis were performed with negative results. The patient received acyclovir empirically, but no other antimicrobial or immunomodulatory therapy was administered. Other differential diagnoses were considered; for example, drug-induced aseptic meningoencephalitis. This condition is a diagnosis of exclusion, which has been linked to NSAID use in rare cases [6]. Unfortunately, enterovirus testing was performed only in cerebrospinal fluid and no respiratory tract or fecal samples were collected.

However, serological testing for MPXV antibodies in serum and CSF showed a ratio suggestive of intrathecal antibody production in response to MPXV CNS infection. The findings of antibodies to EBV and syphilis were expected because the patient had been treated for syphilis five months prior to contracting mpox and had serological signs of past EBV infection (presence of EBNA antibodies). Similar patterns of antibody detection paired with negative PCR in CSF occurs in other types of meningoencephalitis caused by known neurotropic pathogens such as TBE [7].

Compared to previously reported cases of MPXV meningoencephalitis, our patient differed in the relatively brief disease course with rapid and prompt resolution of symptoms. To our knowledge, there is only one previous report presenting CSF results, a case report from 2003 of a 6-year-old girl with encephalitis and confirmed MPXV infection from PCR of a skin biopsy who had a negative orthopox PCR for the CSF but positive IgM in the CSF [5]. The same pattern was observed in our patient, with the diagnosis confirmed by signs of intrathecal MPXV antibody production. Our patient did not have any known or suspected immunosuppressive condition, and this may have allowed for early clearance of MPXV in the CNS.

We speculate that CNS involvement within the course of mpox episodes might be more frequent than previously estimated, and that the course of MPXV meningoencephalitis can show a spectrum of manifestations, including mild and self-limiting episodes. In order to elucidate this, lumbar puncture for MPXV diagnostics (PCR, followed by serology in PCR-negative cases) should be considered more broadly in patients with MPXV disease, in particular if CNS symptoms (even mild) occur.

Conclusion

In summary, we present clinical, microbiological, and radiological data from a previously healthy patient with signs of CNS involvement within an outbreak of mpox infection. Central nervous system complications need to be considered in patients with mpox with compatible clinical manifestations, and serology of CSF can be of diagnostic value.

Data availability

To request data from this study the corresponding author may be contacted.

Abbreviations

CNS:

Central nervous system

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

GCS:

Glasgow Coma Scale

MPXV:

monkeypox virus

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PCR:

Polymerase-chain reaction

OPXV:

orthopox virus

TBE:

tick-borne encephalitis

References

  1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control/WHO Regional Office for Europe. Monkeypox JEo 12 October, 2022.

  2. Vaughan AM, Cenciarelli O, Colombe S, Alves de Sousa L, Fischer N, Gossner CM, et al. A large multi-country outbreak of monkeypox across 41 countries in the WHO European Region, 7 March to 23 August 2022. Eurosurveillance. 2022;27(36):2200620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S, Rockstroh J, Antinori A, Harrison LB, et al. Monkeypox Virus infection in humans across 16 countries - April-June 2022. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(8):679–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Badenoch JB, Conti I, Rengasamy ER, Watson CJ, Butler M, Hussain Z et al. Neurological and psychiatric presentations associated with human monkeypox virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2022:101644.

  5. Sejvar JJ, Chowdary Y, Schomogyi M, Stevens J, Patel J, Karem K, et al. Human monkeypox infection: a family cluster in the midwestern United States. J Infect Dis. 2004;190(10):1833–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalmi G, Javeri F, Vanjak A, Kirren Q, Green A, Jarrin I, et al. Drug-induced meningitis: a review of the literature and comparison with an historical cohort of viral meningitis cases. Therapie. 2020;75(6):605–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taba P, Schmutzhard E, Forsberg P, Lutsar I, Ljøstad U, Mygland Å, et al. EAN consensus review on prevention, diagnosis and management of tick-borne encephalitis. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(10):1214–e61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. No specific funding was obtained for this article.

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YB, KH and KS drafted the article. KH, YB and PB were involved in the data collection and clinical management of the patient. SS and AP performed laboratory experiments. KS planned and supervised laboratory work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sondén Klara.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent to publish this case report have been obtained from the patient. Documentation available upon request. All identifying information has been removed from this manuscript and figures.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this case report in an online open-access publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1:

Description of DNA extraction and PCR method

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karin, H., Ylva, B., Sandra, S. et al. Monkeypox virus-associated meningoencephalitis diagnosed by detection of intrathecal antibody production. BMC Infect Dis 24, 94 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-024-09000-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12879-024-09000-0

Keywords